Thursday, January 31, 2008

Kinsella - When peevishness clouds your perception of cool

Poor Warren, this is actually kinda sad.

Evidently WK's Jan 30th posting of the Rollins on Coulter vid is meant to be some sort of attack on Kate and Shaidle. So we get 2 windbags for the price of 1. I can't imagine a more absurd spectacle. Here we have Kinsella, an allegedly astute observer of something or other, imagining that Rollins is actually taken seriously by anyone not soaked in some sort of drug-addled nostalgia. Hey his stuff was monotoned crap, much like WK, come to think of it.

Hmm Warren could it be you're still smarting over the public ridicule and absolutely definitive drubbing you and your buddy Lucy Warman have suffered over the Section 13(1) CHRC affair?

Now we have today's fabulous news: Dr. Keith Martin's private member's bill, the man's a Liberal no less, calling for Section 13(1) to be deleted, this oughta really set WK off.

All that huffing and bluffing gone for naught, tsk tsk.

How ya feelin there Bud?

6 comments:

Mjölnir said...

Methinks Chinsella is more or less "pant-less" in his domestic environs.. How else can one explain the masochistic self inflicted blogosphere whippings from the two Kay's he keeps getting?

Or.. he secretly fantasizes about one/both of them..

I hope Kate or Kathy don't read this, they'll never look at hand cream the same again..

Blazing Cat Fur said...

Priceless. Thank you.

Seraphic Single said...

I didn't watch the video as I'm none to fond of salty language, but my guess is that WK is trying to make a comment on what K & K look like. Now I am very confused because I thought this Kinsella person was left-wing and therefore a feminist. And feminists don't value women by their looks, right? (Of couse, I could be wrong, and what WK found unattractive was K's ability to kill her own food, which might be construed as unladylike. But feminists don't care about women being ladylike, so I am more confused than ever.)

I really don't understand when left wingers are so rude to women because I grew up thinking that they were on women's SIDE (unless, I soon realized, those women were Catholic, evangelical, Mennonite Orthodox Jews or otherwise pro-life.)

Blazing Cat Fur said...

That pretty much sums things up Seraph! In a way it parallels my own experience with the left, one is lured by a facade of of "ideals" - it's very appealling on the surface. You soon realize it's all a false front.

Anonymous said...

Rollins? Good Lord, the guy was one step above a tattooed circus freak. An excellent musical idol for wk. And he really is obsessed with the two gals, isn't? I t'ink his oncle jean chretien should call him up and yell at 'im, by gar!

Incognito said...

Suing?????? Holy shit... just since you started blogging again...more info... email me..