Globe & Mail, Margaret Wente: Free speech has to be for everyone :
"University of Toronto president David Naylor confesses that this isn't his favourite time of year. "It is the consistently worst week of a president's life," he sighs.
Yes, it's Israel Apartheid Week - the annual Israel-bashing fest with the usual small band of activists and crackpots, and speakers from that champion of universal justice, the Canadian Union of Public Employees.
...
Are anti-Semites a threat to public safety? Here in North America, the answer is surely no, so long as they don't go round firebombing synagogues. Are anti-homosexuals? No again, so long as they're not physically engaged in gay-bashing. So long as equality before the law is the law of the land, we don't need hate-speech laws to protect people. And no matter how words hurt, there's a difference between words and blows.
This distinction appears to have been lost on Alberta's Human Rights Commission, which recently ruled against a conservative Christian who'd written a letter to the Red Deer Advocate in which he called gays "immoral." The commission ruled that his letter was "likely to expose homosexuals to hatred and/or contempt," and even linked it to the beating of a gay teenager, acknowledging the link was "circumstantial." But now, the Christians are claiming equal rights. "
The Rest - great read, Thanks Ms. Wente.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)








2 comments:
"And no matter how words hurt, there's a difference between words and blows."
===================
Geeze. Just think. The people whose fweelings are hurt might just have to grow up and develop alternative ways of interpreting and dealing with hurtful speech. What's that I hear? Heavenly trumpets??
Gabriel is that You?
Post a Comment