...
Inside our law schools then, the very institutions mandated to uphold and transmit reverence for our civilization's most precious convention, a cadre of sex and race-obsessed social engineers is overtly normalizing group grievance with a view to the permanent entrenchment of legal separatism.
Yet in throwing down these gauntlets, feminists and aboriginal activists have, to use a legal term, "opened the door": If sex and race, why not shariah? Or Wicca, or black liberation "theology" — or, like, whatever?
The Rest
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Kay is a little late in denouncing the race politics of two tiered justice, We have it in Canada's fabian socialist foyer (Ontarrible) already.
Ask anyone from Caledonia about dual standard race based justice and policing.
We are reaping the fruit of multi-cult socialism.
There is lots of corruption already (and always has been) but for some time now it has been premised on the idea that no matter what we "progressives" demand, daddy, or whitey, or the corporate system, or liberalism, or whatever is thought to run the show, will always be there to bail us out, to pay the moral blackmail we demand in the name of progress and denial that it is blackmail.
Thus, the corruptors don't even have to take seriously (because one no longer can) a "socialist" or any other possible alternative system. Just as long as someone is there to take care of the problems when our social experiments fail. All the corruptors seem to need is a vague sense that there should be a Utopian alternative to the harder parts of present reality. Then they can convince themselves they're not blackmailers and never have to prove otherwise.
They live in denial of the possibility that their corruption can destroy the system and they will have nothing to replace it with. The only question remaining is once they see, up close and personal like, a true glimpse of the more primitive laws and lords who will replace the present system, when and if destroyed, will they have the sense, courage, or means to pull back from their playing with the Other?
Or, alternatively, can they get away with their emotional and moral blackmail for the foreseeable future? Is the present system sufficiently robust to keep paying the bastards off? That's what they're betting on and good people have no choice but to bet against it while hoping they're right.
As a female I agree with her point of view, I did not give the "Sensible" shoe wearing Female crowd the right to speak for me. I don't agree with having two tiers of law to pander to females, or oppress them. These female lawyers are like Sharia Law, they assume (make an ass of one's self) that I agree with their agenda I don't.
Multicut sucks, you can dress it up and take it to dinner but in the end it taste like sawdust. Not all cultures are equal, nor are all sexes equal.
I'm tired of these women being allowed to say they speak for me, they don't. If I want my Conservative voice heard I shall speak out of my own mouth.
Great article by BK! An excellent comments thread too.
Post a Comment