Edward Michael George dissects Max Yalden's self-serving apologia for the censorship set.
Much as it galls me to have to read gunk like this, it is, as they say, always useful to know what tune the devil's playing. Useful because, if you're paying any attention at all, its discordancies become quite obvious and easily identified.
The rest of The Passion of the Left
....
More on our favourite topic....
Canada's Human Rights Commission: A National Disgrace - Barry Artisite
Friday, April 11, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Why are we surprised as Yalden's attitude? He's a piece of the apparatus, why would his social control agendas differ from his Fabian globalist masters?
I mean look at this creep's history; a career elite, hooked into the most oblique global manipulators on earth: UNHRC, RIIA, CIIA and some other globalist social engineering think tanks like the club of Rome.
The man has made a career of manipulating public policy without the trouble and risk of standing for election to do so. This is a BIG termite in the democratic wood work. One of the global elite class who think they have some divine sanction to rule us and circumvent democratic popular will with elitist globalist quasi-governmental policy making.
This is why I gagged when I saw this huckster reference JS Mill. His social control philosophy is the antithesis to all that Mill stood for.
NOTHING these elitist career manipulators say holds any water for those who value a free society and inclusive populist democracy in a sovereign nation state.
As many political historians have noted, since the post war era the thrust of the transnational social engineering elite has been to invent policy and purpose that circumvents nation state sovereignty and constitutional authority and truncates the empowerment and freedom of the individual in the free liberal democracies. Essentially making both subordinate to global governing diktat and an unelected elite who pull the levers.
Max does not disappoint, he is true to the credo of his Fabian society mentors: The incremental installation of global socialism by policy influence and propaganda.
Fabians are trained to avoid the demands of the electoral systems in democracies to achieve these goals. The UNHRC and other international policy committees seems like the logical place for a modern Fabian to continue their agenda of collectivist globalism.
Thus we can understand why Max would seek refuge and authority in the UN.
Many of us, even the majority, and I include myself among them, are just waking up to how deep the rot goes within our society. We have been asleep at the wheel.
If you study the methods and policy actuation of the players who control elite NGO policy making cliques, you begin to understand that the march to oligarchic globalism started more than 200 years ago and the social planners have not deviated in method or agenda.
The patrician intelligentsia of 18th century Europe foresaw a day when imperialist hegemony would have to be actuated through highly influential elitist policy groups who skirt the newly blossomed democratic systems. The object was to install a global governing dynasty who really do not answer to anyone.
The planning started in an age when democracies and commoner empowerment were in ascendancy and aristocratic autocracy was in decline. The elite loathe to rescind their power to the mob and devised strategies and actuation plans to circumvent the emerging democratic systems and install their elite cliques as social policy directorates. These plans were carried forward by exclusive dynastic establishment insider societies/cliques.
Prof. Carroll Quigley makes this abundantly clear in his opus on the global elite called "Tradgedy and Hope". Also his "The Anglo American Establishment" gives you a working "org chart" of the policy/power brokers in American aristocracy.
Cecil Rhodes was a patriarch of the current globalist elite and the institutions he set in motion survive and flourish in different forms in the western nations.
So called progressivists and sundry leftists have been quick to seek power through toadying to these establishment elite policy making cliques. Ironic that the so called advocates of class struggle populism would use a power brokering tool created by imperialist aristocrats 200 years previous, but this is the reality of modern power politics.
You should understand at this level of power brokering there are no ideologies or partisanism, just the agenda of power and using it to propell the consolidating of power in fewer and fewer hands.
This is why the UN's global socialist policy is touted by the world's richest people. The UN and CFR and Trilateral commission and the hundreds of wealth laundering foundations which they created to expand their influence brokering are set up by some of the world's wealthiest and politically influential people.
It is really no surprise that the globalist elite (presumed uber-capitalists) would embrace statist collectivism taken to global domains by the UN and other global governing bodies.
The players who work the switches of globalism cannot be voted from office.
If one understands that statist socialism is NOT a share the wealth agenda but a politically actuated plan to consolidate economic and political power and control in the hands of an elite ruling cartel, then the paradox of super rich men promoting socialist global agendas becomes no paradox at all. Instead it becomes logical, even the perfect tool for super-affluent power-seeking megalomaniacs. (Turner, Soros, Gates and Rockefeller come to mind here)
Global village collectivism, or more accurately, globalized soviet socialism, is not a movement of the down-trodden masses but of the economic and political elite.
These influential UN NGOs and quasi-governmental global bodies have created civil control policy that has pervaded the domestic law and governing institutions of both America and Canada....the result has been the constant post war depletion of individual civil liberty, freedom and national sovereignty of our nation though "treaty attrition" with globalist regulatory bodies.
Be conscious of its many tentacles that reach into the constitutional relevance of your democracy.
Heh Ghost,
you're so right you should leave some sign of where we can go to read more...
The UN and it;s many NGO organs has experienced "policy creep" and now attempt to stray dangerouslt beyond their original madate. The result is interference in the domestic affairs and popular will of democratic sovereign nations.
It has out lived its purpose and now acts as an adovate for every axe grinding NGO which has an agenda unpalatable to the democratic will of free nations.
Clean it up or pull us out of every UN committee and treaty that does not directly pertain to global peace keeping.
I agree with Trupeers Ghost leave us a crumb!
This is a very simple primer on one arm of the global elite, the Anglo American aristocracy which established the UN after the British Fabian society failed with the legaue of nations in the days when nation state sovereignty was absolute. Another global war had to be waged to weaken the resolve of nation states to give up their sovereignty to a global govering body...the horrors of WW2 did that...the UN was born.
Watch this, then get Quigley's writings and read!! Also Eustace Mullens - Ezra Pound's researcher on the American private banking coup of 1913.
If this makes you thirst for more esoteric history let me know, I have a lot of links. But understand the history of the elite of the Anglo American establishment first and understand how they have, and do, exert undue influence on government, basically negating democratic popular will.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRkCvubUGCM
I've been trying to understand esoteric history for much of my life; but I'd kind of come to the conclusion that the esoteric can have no history.
Post a Comment