Another day, another weirdo. Say hello to Mitra Kermani, Crazy or just a Halal of a lot of nerve?
Yes she's back, now with "Extra Strength Incoherence!"
Also see Mitra's visit to timeimmortal - Reader Mail: Latest and Full true story of Mitra Kermani
Read the comments;)
.....
Paging Jay Currie ....
Wednesday, June 04, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
20 comments:
Am I allowed to call that woman a bitch??? Wowza she's the kind of person that the HRCs' love, talk a about a marginalized member of the community. She apparently demands you do business with her or else she'll hound you like a ghost.
FFF can handle her, if not the cops can haul her crazy ass off to a mental institution.
I expect the CHRC is readying the charges as we speak.
I'm not sure who I would be more fearful of, if spat same to spit: KS or that shareep creep.
"not-very-patiently"! Love it.
I guess the shareep creep never heard of CHRC wardriving fake-alikes where she could have muzzled thousands and thousands over decades.
But on a more serious note to KS. Please take extra care! We need you.
Ah, Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board and the CHRC "Rights without Responsibilities" industry.
The gift to Canada that keeps on giving.
PS: Mitra Kermani - female circumcision is also practiced abroad too but I suggest that you do not try and import that for your friends.
Maybe go after Dud too for cracking racist Irishman jokes.
Sic 'em Jay
Note:
why do you use bad language before hear other side of story how do you know Mitra Kermani did even one mistake taht is reason Loblaw fight end for 3 years not able to won Mitra Kermani in any faul and any misconduct in past she did the best job the plate form was halal but later the most second customer of Mitra Kermani in Loblaw was veggi food lover who loved Mitra Kermani pizza veggi and felafel and so many items sold in Canada
Mitra Kermani is only woman able to sell halal food and she is only one seat so close with non Muslim with all respect for their belief for 8 years.
Mitra Kermani's father worked for 35 years with Jewish Irainan she is not antijewish at all. she grow up with full respect but keep her belife free from others and not interfer in some one else hwo to love god.
Muslim woman do not do femal circumcision only black african in North of Africa do this culture.
Muslim men like Jewish men like so many other men do circumcision.
National post story is half fake half is true and said by favor of Loblaw Elizabeth Margless who is Jewish anti Muslim helped Jewish Michael Kimber lawyer of Loblaw who destroyed and put endanger all security of halal food in Loblaw in year 2005. that kind of hate crime only seen from Jewish against Muslim who hate Muslim halal food come up.
when news went up and Mitra Kermani did not convicted of criminal harrasment they made new sory saying Michael Kimber was only a lawyer plan to help his customer John Tavlari while the evidence showed Michael Kimber breached Mitra Kermani contrct on June 24, 2005 with help and order of John Tavalri while they knew this is claim agaisnt Mitra Kermani made all story and none of statment of Michael Kimber get proof and
Frequently asking question in Islam:
http://al-islam.org/static.php?content=faq
----
Learn about Islam in simple way for beginners:
http://al-islam.org/index.php?sid=489855789&t=80&cat=80
------------------------
Learn about: how the holy book of QURAN wrote and Tafseer means explanation of bit by bit of Quran like Allah means what? Etc.: almizan is one the best book explain quaran and Mr. Tabatabi wrote this book: this is advance books
http://www.almizan.org/
http://www.almizan.org/new/Tafseer/volume1.asp
http://www.almizan.org/Tafseer/Volume1/fateha1.asp
------------------------
What is Shia wrote: learn more about Islam
http://www.shia.org/islamicwww.html
http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/books/ahlulbayt/index.htm
What Iranian are saying find it in Shia web page
----
If you look for specific information use search engine go to this web page:
http://al-islam.org/dilpprojects.php
Type your wording in search engine
In above search engine type to know Islam and marriage to reduce AIDS and cleaning and wash body to prevent AIDS:
Marriage and Morals in Islam by Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi Views: 25640
Home > Browse Library > Laws, Practice, and Worship > Marriage
Home > Browse Library > Society > Family & Societal Issues
Useful guide including discussions on Western sexual morality, Islamic sexual morality, Islamic view of marriage and women, beginning of sexual life, rules of marriage and the wedding night, contraceptives abortion, and human reproduction. An essential guide for every bride and groom.
=====
If you have more questions to ask scholar in Islam:
Use this web page:
http://al-islam.org/static.php?content=contact
----
For chat and know about Islam politely:
http://soundvision.com
===============
There is border and difference for slander and gossip Muslim
Than criticize Muslim or show your disagreement
With in their idea than all the time show hate in everything they do or all the time belittle them is bullies and if they got right and bullies get made means the limit can break
And bullies continue the wrong behaviour lead
The criminal harassment by scare them and label them
There is not such the thing Muslim are bad and I enjoy talk about them bad and I must fight Muslim or I fight criminal in Afghanistan are two different issues
=====
Recommendation to all:
let blogs change their way of they talking to they way Muslim listen to them if you start the first paragraph with hate crime Muslim are not sees blogs are serious people just like slander and gossip them
The problems between blogs and writer can change the mode of written in English for nicer word to insult word this way communication can started
think you are the best and Muslim are not and you are teacher and Muslim are student in Canada not know what you thinking and you think you know better than them while sometimes student grow and can be smarter than teacher
How about made it nicer writing and you see all things will resolve
----
To Hollywood and other movie maker in Canada see Muslim film festival you do not need to use sex to sell your film you can use more interesting film that audience listen or watch
Change your film with no violence to kill Muslim terrorist and Mafia Italian made to reality and see what made people like to see your film better and reduce hate
---
Tell game Play station 3 cut violence in their game all high school crime is because of all media brain wash children and made them hate or see game like real life cut violence from game this is media change children crime
-----
tell sexy movie go look for new job or made exercise salon to train good body and made money not to go and sell body to made you money on table you destroy brain of young people if you like to destroy young in Canada give them drugs and give them adultery movies and give them no education very soon Canada will get corrupted look at that foreign minister talk about how to made army to Afghanistan in bed with her x-girl friend that proof with that mentality for sure country not know why they involve with war in Afghanistan since x-girlfriend order war probably
---
Tell illegal drugs dealer change their job such as selling some herbal drugs with some restricting to pharmaceuticals to used drugs in correct dosage or do more research in what herbal illegal drugs should ban but used drugs illegal made destroy and corrupt countries and used life in wrong ways
You can relax with using correct pharmaceutical drugs legally to get arrested and destroy human mind by using drug only for wrong enjoyment and increase mental health in west
----
Tell beach and sea lover cover up you do not need to get naked to enjoy stay in summer and let other watch your wife or your husband body
----
Tell UN to disarm all countries and all countries had member to prevent other countries attack their countries
Cut war
Tell weapon maker to cut the weapon increase prevention and have more security in entrance of each movement building and devices to know or watch before it happened
Stop the war
--
The world trade center made all worlds full not hungry for keep one rich and other hungry
tell rich to pay their damage goods such as Adidas shoes last year destroy so many shoes while they can gave to government and that movement sell cheap to poor countries this way government made money over damage and help hunger to have shoes
Made all world like state and keep people helped not separated by boarder or language or others nonsense
----
people tell the magazine do not hurt celebrity by follow them look what they done to prince Diana do not get obsesses to follow rich people to destroy their privacy by lie about them
Again media is important factor to made all world in peace or used their pen to made world in war
---
Support and upgrade human right not fight with it
Not necessary every thing in human right is may perfect but not put down humanity and label human while they are not guilty
----
Follow the law and let police handle the law and direct it
--
have fun and have self-confidence being rich not mean all the good and being poor nothing too bad about it change your life style and find real solution close your heart to god.
--
Finally train police with more communication and put more psychologists in jail to help criminal and mental health or teenager or war or soldier you don�t need to be crazy to go to psychologist
Upgrade education in Canada
There is not communication between Muslim with no Muslim because of discrimination and racism
================
Canadian Human Rights Act
CHAPTER H-6
PART I -- PROSCRIBED DISCRIMINATION
General
Proscribed grounds of discrimination
3. (1) For all purposes of this Act, race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, marital status, family status, disability and conviction for which a pardon has been granted are prohibited grounds of discrimination.
Idem
(2) Where the ground of discrimination is pregnancy or child-birth, the discrimination shall be deemed to be on the ground of sex. [1976-77, c.33, s.3; 1980-81-82-83, c.143, s.2.]
Orders in respect of discriminatory practices
4. A discriminatory practice, as described in sections 5 to 14, may be the subject of a complaint under Part III and anyone found to be engaging or to have engaged in a discriminatory practice may be made subject to an order as provided in sections 53 and 54. [1976-77, c.33, s.4; 1980-81-82-83, c.143, s.2.]
Discriminatory Practices
Denial of good, service, facility or accommodation
5. It is a discriminatory practice in the provision of goods, services, facilities or accommodation customarily available to the general public
(a) to deny, or to deny access to, any such good, service, facility or accommodation to any individual, or
(b) to differentiate adversely in relation to any individual, on a prohibited ground of discrimination. [1976-77, c.33, s.5.]
Denial of commercial premises or residential accommodation
6. It is a discriminatory practice in the provision of commercial premises or residential accommodation
(a) to deny occupancy of such premises or accommodation to any individual, or
(b) to differentiate adversely in relation to any individual, on a prohibited ground of discrimination. [1976-77, c.33, s.6.]
Employment
7. It is a discriminatory practice, directly or indirectly,
(a) to refuse to employ or continue to employ any individual, or
(b) in the course of employment, to differentiate adversely in relation to an employee, on a prohibited ground of discrimination. [1976-77, c.33, s.7.]
Employment applications, advertisements
8. It is a discriminatory practice
(a) to use or circulate any form of application for employment, or
(b) in connection with employment or prospective employment, to publish any advertisement or to make any written or oral inquiry that expresses or implies any limitation, specification or preference based on a prohibited ground of discrimination. [1976-77, c.33, s.8.]
Employee organizations
9. (1) It is a discriminatory practice for an employee organization on a prohibited ground of discrimination
(a) to exclude an individual from full membership in the organization;
(b) to expel or suspend a member of the organization; or
(c) to limit, segregate, classify or otherwise act in relation to an individual in a way that would deprive the individual of employment opportunities, or limit employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect the status of the individual, where the individual is a member of the organization or where any of the obligations of the organization pursuant to a collective agreement relate to the individual.
Exception
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), it is not a discriminatory practice for an employee organization to exclude, expel or suspend an individual from membership in the organization because that individual has reached the normal age of retirement for individuals working in positions similar to the position of that individual.
Definition of "employee organization"
(3) For the purposes of this section and sections 10 and 60, "employee organization" includes a trade union or other organization of employees or local thereof, the purposes of which include the negotiation, on behalf of employees, of the terms and conditions of employment with employers. [1976-77, c.33, s.9; 1980-81-82-83, c.143, s.4.]
Discriminatory policy or practice
10. It is a discriminatory practice for an employer, employee organization or organization of employers
(a) to establish or pursue a policy or practice, or
(b) to enter into an agreement affecting recruitment, referral, hiring, promotion, training, apprenticeship, transfer or any other matter relating to employment or prospective employment, that deprives or tends to deprive an individual or class of individuals of any employment opportunities on a prohibited ground of discrimination. [1976-77, c.33, s.10; 1980-81-82-83, c.143, s.5.]
Equal wages
11. (1) It is a discriminatory practice for an employer to establish or maintain differences in wages between male and female employees employed in the same establishment who are performing work of equal value.
Assessment of value of work
(2) In assessing the value of work performed by employees employed in the same establishment, the criterion to be applied is the composite of the skill, effort and responsibility required in the performance of the work and the conditions under which the work is performed.
Separate establishments
(3) Separate establishments established or maintained by an employer solely or principally for the purpose of establishing or maintaining differences in wages between male and female employees shall be deemed for the purposes of this section to be the same establishment.
Different wages based on prescribed reasonable factors
(4) Notwithstanding subsection (1), it is not a discriminatory practice to pay to male and female employees different wages if the difference is based on a factor prescribed by guidelines, issued by the Canadian Human Rights Commission pursuant to subsection 27(2), to be a reasonable factor that justifies the difference.
Idem
(5) For greater certainty, sex does not constitute a reasonable factor justifying a difference in wages.
No reduction of wages
(6) An employer shall not reduce wages in order to eliminate a discriminatory practice described in this section.
Definition of "wages"
(7) For the purposes of this section, "wages" means any form of remuneration payable for work performed by an individual and includes
(a) salaries, commissions, vacation pay, dismissal wages and bonuses;
(b) reasonable value for board, rent, housing and lodging;
(c) payments in kind;
(d) employer contributions to pension funds or plans, long- term disability plans and all forms of health insurance plans; and
(e) any other advantage received directly or indirectly from the individual's employer. [1976-77, c.33, s.11.]
Publication of discriminatory notices, etc.
12. It is a discriminatory practice to publish or display before the public or to cause to be published or displayed before the public any notice, sign, symbol, emblem or other representation that
(a) expresses or implies discrimination or an intention to discriminate, or
(b) incites or is calculated to incite others to discriminate if the discrimination expressed or implied, intended to be expressed or implied or incited or calculated to be incited would otherwise, if engaged in, be a discriminatory practice described in any of sections 5 to 11 or in section 14. [1976-77, c.33, s.12; 1980-81-82-83, c.143, s.6.]
Hate messages
13. (1) It is a discriminatory practice for a person or a group of persons acting in concert to communicate telephonically or to cause to be so communicated, repeatedly, in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking within the legislative authority of Parliament, any matter that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt by reason of the fact that that person or those persons are identifiable on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.
Exception
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply in respect of any matter that is communicated in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a broadcasting undertaking.
Interpretation
(3) For the purposes of this section, no owner or operator of a telecommunication undertaking communicates or causes to be communicated any matter described in subsection (1) by reason only that the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking owned or operated by that person are used by other persons for the transmission of that matter. [1976-77, c.33, s.13.]
Harassment
14. (1) It is a discriminatory practice,
(a) in the provision of goods, services, facilities or accommodation customarily available to the general public,
(b) in the provision of commercial premises or residential accommodation, or
(c) in matters related to employment, to harass an individual on a prohibited ground of discrimination.
Sexual harassment
(2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), sexual harassment shall, for the purposes of that subsection, be deemed to be harassment on a prohibited ground of discrimination. [1980-81-82-83, c.143, s.7.]
Exceptions
15. It is not a discriminatory practice if
(a) any refusal, exclusion, expulsion, suspension, limitation, specification or preference in relation to any employment is established by an employer to be based on a bona fide occupational requirement;
(b) employment of an individual is refused or terminated because that individual has not reached the minimum age, or has reached the maximum age, that applies to that employment by law or under regulations, which may be made by the Governor in Council for the purposes of this paragraph;
(c) an individual's employment is terminated because that individual has reached the normal age of retirement for employees working in positions similar to the position of that individual;
(d) the terms and conditions of any pension fund or plan established by an employer provide for the compulsory vesting or locking-in of pension contributions at a fixed or determinable age in accordance with sections 17 and 18 of the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985;
(e) an individual is discriminated against on a prohibited ground of discrimination in a manner that is prescribed by guidelines, issued by the Canadian Human Rights Commission pursuant to subsection 27(2), to be reasonable;
(f) an employer grants a female employee special leave or benefits in connection with pregnancy or child-birth or grants employees special leave or benefits to assist them in the care of their children; or
(g) in the circumstances described in section 5 or 6, an individual is denied any goods, services, facilities or accommodation or access thereto or occupancy of any commercial premises or residential accommodation or is a victim of any adverse differentiation and there is bona fide justification for that denial or differentiation. [R.S., 1985, c.H-6, s.15; R.S., 1985, c.32 (2nd Supp.), s.41.]
Special programs
16. (1) It is not a discriminatory practice for a person to adopt or carry out a special program, plan or arrangement designed to prevent disadvantages that are likely to be suffered by, or to eliminate or reduce disadvantages that are suffered by, any group of individuals when those disadvantages would be or are based on or related to the race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, marital status, family status or disability of members of that group, by improving opportunities respecting goods, services, facilities, accommodation or employment in relation to that group.
Advice and assistance
(2) The Canadian Human Rights Commission may
(a) make general recommendations concerning desirable objectives for special programs, plans or arrangements referred to in subsection (1); and
(b) on application, give such advice and assistance with respect to the adoption or carrying out of a special program, plan or arrangement referred to in subsection (1) as will serve to aid in the achievement of the objectives the program, plan or arrangement was designed to achieve. [1976-77, c.33, s.15; 1980-81-82-83, c.143, s.8.]
Plans to meet the needs of disabled persons
17. (1) A person who proposes to implement a plan for adapting any services, facilities, premises, equipment or operations to meet the needs of persons arising from a disability may apply to the Canadian Human Rights Commission for approval of the plan.
Approval of plan
(2) The Commission may, by written notice to a person making an application pursuant to subsection (1), approve the plan if the Commission is satisfied that the plan is appropriate for meeting the needs of persons arising from a disability.
Effect of approval of accommodation plan
(3) Where any services, facilities, premises, equipment or operations are adapted in accordance with a plan approved under subsection (2), matters for which the plan provides do not constitute any basis for a complaint under Part III regarding discrimination based on any disability in respect of which the plan was approved.
Notice when application not granted
(4) When the Commission decides not to grant an application made pursuant to subsection (1), it shall send a written notice of its decision to the applicant setting out the reasons for its decision. [1980-81-82-83, c.143, s.9.]
Rescinding approval of plan
18. (1) If the Canadian Human Rights Commission is satisfied that, by reason of any change in circumstances, a plan approved under subsection 17(2) has ceased to be appropriate for meeting the needs of persons arising from a disability, the Commission may, by written notice to the person who proposes to carry out or maintains the adaptation contemplated by the plan or any part thereof, rescind its approval of the plan to the extent required by the change in circumstances.
Effect where approval rescinded
(2) To the extent to which approval of a plan is rescinded under subsection (1), subsection 17(3) does not apply to the plan if the discriminatory practice to which the complaint relates is subsequent to the rescission of the approval.
Statement of reasons for rescinding approval
(3) Where the Commission rescinds approval of a plan pursuant to subsection (1), it shall include in the notice referred to therein a statement of its reasons therefor. [1980-81-82-83, c.143, s.9.]
Opportunity to make representations
19. (1) Before making its decision on an application or rescinding approval of a plan pursuant to section 17 or 18, the Canadian Human Rights Commission shall afford each person directly concerned with the matter an opportunity to make representations with respect thereto.
Restriction on deeming plan inappropriate
(2) For the purposes of sections 17 and 18, a plan shall not, by reason only that it does not conform to any standards prescribed pursuant to section 24, be deemed to be inappropriate for meeting the needs of persons arising from disability. [1980-81-82-83, c.143, s.9.]
Certain provisions not discriminatory
20. A provision of a pension or insurance fund or plan that preserves rights acquired prior to March 1, 1978 or that preserves pension or other benefits accrued prior to that time does not constitute the basis for a complaint under Part III that an employer is engaging or has engaged in a discriminatory practice. [1976-77, c.33, s.16.]
Funds and plans
21. The establishment of separate pension funds or plans for different groups of employees does not constitute the basis for a complaint under Part III that an employer is engaging or has engaged in a discriminatory practice if the employees are not grouped in those funds or plans according to a prohibited ground of discrimination. [1976-77, c.33, s.17.]
Regulations
22. The Governor in Council may, by regulation, prescribe the provisions of any pension or insurance fund or plan, in addition to those provisions described in sections 20 and 21, that do not constitute the basis for a complaint under Part III that an employer is engaging or has engaged in a discriminatory practice. [1976-77, c.33, s.18.]
Regulations
23. The Governor in Council may make regulations respecting the terms and conditions to be included in or applicable to any contract, licence or grant made or granted by Her Majesty in right of Canada providing for
(a) the prohibition of discriminatory practices described in sections 5 to 14; and
(b) the resolution, by the procedure set out in Part III, of complaints of discriminatory practices contrary to such terms and conditions. [1976-77, c.33, s.19; 1980-81-82-83, c.143, s.10.]
Accessibility standards
24. (1) The Governor in Council may, for the benefit of persons having any disability, make regulations prescribing standards of accessibility to services, facilities or premises.
Effect of meeting accessibility standards
(2) Where standards prescribed pursuant to subsection (1) are met in providing access to any services, facilities or premises, a matter of access thereto does not constitute any basis for a complaint under Part III regarding discrimination based on any disability in respect of which the standards are prescribed.
Publication of proposed regulations
(3) Subject to subsection (4), a copy of each regulation that the Governor in Council proposes to make pursuant to this section shall be published in the Canada Gazette and a reasonable opportunity shall be afforded to interested persons to make representations with respect thereto.
Exception
(4) Subsection (3) does not apply in respect of a proposed regulation that has been published pursuant to that subsection, whether or not it has been amended as a result of representations made pursuant to that subsection.
Discriminatory practice not constituted by variance from standards
(5) Nothing shall, by virtue only of its being at variance with any standards prescribed pursuant to subsection (1), be deemed to constitute a discriminatory practice. [1980-81-82-83, c.143, s.11.]
Definitions
25. In this Act, "conviction for which a pardon has been granted" means a conviction of an individual for an offence in respect of which a pardon has been granted by any authority under law and, if granted under the Criminal Records Act, not revoked; "disability" means any previous or existing mental or physical disability and includes disfigurement and previous or existing dependence on alcohol or a drug. [1976-77, c.33, s.20; 1980-81-82-83, c.143, s.12.]
Previous: Preamble
Next: Part II - CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
====================
Constitution Act, 1982
Enacted as Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11, which came into force on April 17, 1982
PART I
Canadian charter of rights and freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
Fundamental Freedoms
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
a) Freedom of conscience and religion;
b) Freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
c) Freedom of peaceful assembly; and
d) Freedom of association.
Democratic Rights
(4) Subsections (2) and (3) do not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration in a province of conditions of individuals in that province who are socially or economically disadvantaged if the rate of employment in that province is below the rate of employment in Canada.
Legal Rights
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
9. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.
10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention
a) To be informed promptly of the reasons therefore;
b) To retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right; and
c) To have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpus and to be released if the detention is not lawful.
11. Any person charged with an offence has the right
a) To be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence;
b) To be tried within a reasonable time;
c) Not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that person in respect of the offence;
d) To be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;
e) Not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause;
f) except in the case of an offence under military law tried before a military tribunal, to the benefit of trial by jury where the maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment;
g) not to be found guilty on account of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it constituted an offence under Canadian or international law or was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations;
h) if finally acquitted of the offence, not to be tried for it again and, if finally found guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or punished for it again; and
i) If found guilty of the offence and if the punishment for the offence has been varied between the time of commission and the time of sentencing, to the benefit of the lesser punishment.
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
13. A witness who testifies in any proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence.
23. (1) Citizens of Canada
a) whose first language learned and still understood is that of the English or French linguistic minority population of the province in which they reside, or
b) Who have received their primary school instruction in Canada in English or French and reside in a province where the language in which they received that instruction is the language of the English or French linguistic minority population of the province,
Have the right to have their children receive primary and secondary school instruction in that language in that province
24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances
32. (1) This Charter applies
a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
b) To the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province
34. This Part may be cited as the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
==================================
how to fight Muslim in Canada as follows: first increase hate and stick to this policy as Wendy Earle of Borden ladner did that:
Number 1: you need to have a law firm then the best one is to
Choose Borden Ladner Gervais LLP( BLG LLP) tel: 416-367-6000
Located in 40 King street west in Scotia plaza number one firm in Canada that has more than 800 lawyers. ONLY Borden Ladner able to fight Muslim and destroy all human right and human right commission law even recently Borden Ladner Gervais give money to change constitution law and all law and support red neck English and fight Muslim as third world countries came to Canada and must back to they came from.
2. then you need to hire a lawyer go only choose lady lawyer in Borden Ladner Gervias start from Wendy Earle and her assistant who is junior Jewish lawyer is Christina Litt who is ant Muslim right or if they are busy call Winn Outridgh or manager of BLG firm in human resources can found may be worth than Wendy Earle we hear there is so many Wendy Earle in blg firm is working hate Muslim and Muslim human right and like to fight them for ever.
3. your next steps to find the way to label all Muslim in Canada are terrorist and ban them in some street such 22. st. clair or all street of st. clair recently are ban for some Muslim has not right to walk to their building for said blg firm they are terrorist.
4. Belittle Muslim and made them frustrated and loose their self-confidence and act Muslim like black people and bother them until not like to stay in Canada and move back to their third world
5. have you big cheques and money ready at least $200000 upfront and even you can search engine Wendy Earle of Borden Ladner she will give you up to $500000 class law sue to fight Muslim but you have to pay Wendy Earle to fight Muslim laws for you or go to 393 university Ave and ask for help desk all help desk is run by Wendy Earle. if you are small not have money you can borrow from drug dealers and/or all thieves in Canada or all crook work in st. Clair such as Jeff Millers lawyer of Maple leaf food to help you he is Jewish anti Muslim as well. make sue you are go individual and not belong to big company because all big companies thief already are clients of BlG firm and has conflict interest with you go with no big guy but with big box of money to work for you.
6. how they do it they will change all story suddenly it was not Kathy Sheidle who said bad mouthing it suddenly all Muslim said bad about her and all law and Wendy Earle goes to court and lied before all judge without anybody arrest her because upper law society teach their lawyer how to lies in order be good lawyers. You can not lie but your lawyer can lie for you especially if you hire Wendy Earle and Christina Litt of Borden Ladner gervais
7. if they are not help you go to down town area in more than 12 big building such as TD tower and Scotia plaza we have more than 57 big firm working choose other one made sure follow step 2 to 6 and find lawyer act like Wendy Earle for you. made sure lawyer hate Muslim to fight for you and win human right and human right commission and change law and all constitution against Muslim right in Canada: thank you
This is list of other firm you can go and ask for help made sure ask that lawyer act like Wendy Earle:
LIST of biggest law firm in Canada: PROFILES
Aird & Berlis LLP ......1
Baker & McKenzie LLP` ...2.
Bennett Jones LLP ........3...
Bereskin & Parr ......4
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP...5..
Blaney McMurtry LLP ...6..
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP...7.
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP 8..
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP ....9.
Davis & Company LLP....10...
Department of Justice Canada ..11..
Dimock Stratton LLP ......12....
Epstein Cole LLP..........13...
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP.14..
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP......15..
Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP .16..
Gilbert’s LLP ..17..
Goodman and Carr LLP .......18..
Goodmans LLP ....19.......
Gowling Lafleur Henderson Llp..20..
Heenan Blaikie LLP ..21......
Hicks Morley Hamilton Stewart Storie LLP ...22........
Hodgson Shields DesBrisay O’Donnell MacKillop Squire LLP 23Klippensteins ....24.....
Koskie Minsky LLP ..25.....
Lang Michener LLP ........26.......
Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP ...27.................
Lerners LLP ......28.......
Mathews, Dinsdale & Clark LLP ....29........
McCague Peacock Borlack McInnis & Lloyd LLP...30......
McCarthy Tétrault LLP ....31..
McMillan Binch Mendelsohn LLP ...32
Miller Thomson LLP ..33....
Minden Gross Grafstein & Minden Gross Grafstein & Greenstein LLP 34
Ministry of the Attorney General..35
Ministry of the Attorney General - Constitutional Law Branch ..36....
Ministry of the Attorney General - Crown Law Office – Criminal..37
Ministry of the Attorney General / Ministry of Community and Social Services - Family
Responsibility Office ..38..
Ministry of Health and Long Term Care ...39...
Ogilvy Renault LLP..40...
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP ..41.
Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP ...42...
Pinkofskys ..43..
Ridout & Maybee LLP ..44.
Shearman & Sterling LLP ...45..
Sherrard Kuzz LLP ..46..
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP ...47..
Smart & Biggar ....48...
Solmon Rothbart Goodman LLP ..49.
Stikeman Elliott LLP .50...
Thorsteinssons ..51....
Torkin Manes Cohen Arbus LLP ..52.
Torys LLP .53.
WeirFoulds LLP..54.
===================================
Legend: Employer Locator Map (Downtown Core)
1. Royal Bank Plaza – South Plaza
200 Bay Street
Heenan Blaikie LLP
Ogilvy Renault LLP
2. TD Centre - 79 Wellington Street West
Torys LLP
3. BCE Place
181 Bay Street
Aird & Berlis LLP
Baker & McKenzie
Lang Michener LLP
McMillan Binch Mendelsohn LLP
Thorsteinssons LLP
4. Flatiron Building
49 Wellington Street East
Gilbert’s LLP
5. TD Centre – Ernst & Young Tower
222 Bay Street
Skadden, Arps, Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
6. TD Centre – TD Bank Tower
66 Wellington Street West
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
Hicks Morley Hamilton Stewart Storie LLP
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
7. TD Centre - Royal Trust Tower
8. Commerce Court – West Tower
199 Bay Street
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Stikeman Elliott LLP
9. 18 King Street East
Solmon Rothbart Goodman LLP
10. 48 Yonge Street
Hodgson Shields DesBrisay O’Donnell MacKillop
Squire LLP
10. Scotia Plaza
40 King Street West
Bereskin & Parr
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP 416-367-6000
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Miller Thomson
11. First Canadian Place
100 King Street West
Bennett Jones LLP
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP
Davis & Company
Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP
Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
=============
WOW! Do you ever get the coolest comments!
Truepeers, Charles, and I hardly ever get anything even remotely like that. I mean never.
I also man, thank g*d.
Oh yea it's cool to be popular;)
I used to think it was cool to be polar, but then I found that was wrong too. Life is so strange when you're old and have seen lots of it.
I'm gonna try bi-polar next;)
Poor Mitra !
In addition to being bounced by Loblows, she apparently has severe dental problems.
http://www.ocfp.on.ca/local/files/CME/Healthy%20Child%20Development/Coalition%20Report.pdf
page 19.
I don't think that can be blamed on BC Bud ...
Cheezus that would scare anybody straight.
LOL can I say her number one "Borg" fan is a crazy bitch? What's the worst the CHRC can do to me send me to a Federal Pen where I can get a free degree in Social Work like Karla the seriel killer got. Sniff I always wanted to learn to knit, but alas I'm left handed. Am I a marginalized member of society because I'm left handed? Am I being persecuted by every gadget known to man globally because I'm left handed oh Dear God when shall this injustice be exposed?
Oh Rose you have a gold mine there - tell the CHRC you are a persecuted Left-Handed Wiccan - you will win millions!
Ah, Blazing Cat Fur:
Methinks Mitra's public image committee is trying to hijack your lovely blog with inane ramblings as well as proof that s/he/it can "block and copy" legislative texts. Can you spell "wow"? That is SUCH a great strategy when one's psychological balance is so obviously more than a little wobbly.
Personally, I think Mitra and co. should consider searching out alternative clients. Loblaw's is not the only game in town. Am I suggesting that Mitra and co undertake MARKETING their products in a competitive marketplace? How SILLY of me...
My suggestion to Mitra is based upon my observation that MANY non-Muslims that I know have followed the stories of Muslim foodsellers in Britain sprinkling dried human feces (their own) on their food prior to selling them to us dhimmis. Frankly, from observations of the international Muslim community over the last decade, this idea is the type of thing that will catch on.
As a result, many people with whom I am familiar (both in person and online) have decided to ensure that NOTHING edible that they purchase is imported from the ME or prepared and sold by the local "Canadian" Muslim community.
Mitra, good luck with the whole "halal" thing, but stop criminally harrassing Loblaws and libelling their staff and lawyers. There's a cell with your name on it, Mitra dear. Don't push your luck. - SIMON
Diseases of the Soul
Anger (ghadhab)
…Those who spend (freely) whether in prosperity or in adversity; who restrain their anger and pardon men; And Allah loves those who do good. (Qur'an, 3: 134)
Imam Ja’far al-Sadiq (a) said: "Anger is the key (that opens the door) to all kinds of vices." [Al Kulayni, al Kafi, vol. 2, p. 303, hadith # 3]
It is narrated from Imam al Sadiq (a) that he heard his father Imam al Baqir (a), as saying: "A bedouin came to the Prophet (s) and said: `I live in the desert. Teach me the essence of wisdom.' Thereupon the Prophet (s) said to him: `I command you not to get angry'. After repeating his question thrice (and hearing the same reply from the Prophet every time) the bedouin said to himself: `After this I will not ask any question, since the Apostle of God (s) does not command anything but good'." Imam al Sadiq (a) says: "My father used to say, `Is there anything more violent than anger? Verily, a man gets angry and kills someone whose blood has been forbidden by God, or slanders a married woman'."[Al Kulayni, al Kafi, vol. 2, p. 303, hadith # 4]
Reality of Anger
Anger is a psychological state that results from inner agitation and desire for revenge. And when this agitation becomes more violent, it intensifies the fire of anger. A violent commotion engulfs ones brain on account of which the mind and the intellect lose control and become powerless. At that time, the inner state of a person resembles a cave where fire has broken out, filling it with flames and suffocating clouds of smoke that leap out of its mouth with intense heat and a fiery howl. When that happens, it becomes extremely difficult to pacify such a person and to extinguish the fire of his wrath; whatever is thrown in it to cool it down becomes a part of it, adding to its intensity. It is for this reason that such a person becomes blind and deaf to guidance and good etiquettes. In such a condition, all such efforts as counsel, advice, and exhortation fail to appease the person. The more one tries to pacify it through humble requests and efforts, the more violent it becomes until the angry person physically harms someone or seeks revenge.
Imam al Baqir (a) said: “..Indeed, this anger is a spark lit by Satan in the heart of the son of Adam..” [Al Kulayni, al Kafi, vol. 2, p. 304, hadith # 12]
The Devastating Effects and Consequences of Anger
A person given to anger behaves unreasonably like a lunatic without rationally considering the outcome of his actions. He commits ugly and indecent acts and his tongue, limbs, and body go out of his control.
Anger may lead one to use abusive language against the prophets of God and His awliya'. It may lead one to desecrate sanctities and utter slanders about venerable persons, murder a pious or innocent soul, wreck the lives of creatures of God, destroy a family, or reveal the secrets of others tearing up the veils that cover them. There is no limit to such cruel and oppressive acts that a person can commit at the time of outbreak of faith consuming fire of anger that can destroy many homes indeed an entire society.
http://al-islam.org/nutshell/diseases_soul/
( continue…. )
===========
Causality and Freedom
http://al-islam.org/al-tawhid/causality_freedom/
The Theory of Sovereignty in the Interpretation of Causality and its Relation to Human Freedom
The Theory of Sovereignty in the Interpretation of Causality and its Relation to Human Freedom
Mirza Na’ini, one of the founders of modern principles of jurisprudence, was the first one to develop and defend this theory. According to an exposition of the lectures of Na’ini (Ajwad al-Taqrirat), this theory can be traced back to Mirza Muhammad Taqi Isfahani, the author of Hidayat al-Mustarshidin (a commentary work on Ma‘alim Al-Usul). After Na’ini, our great master, the martyr Sadr, reconstructed this theory to meet the problems raised against the theory and, in an innovative way, developed it and called it "The Theory of Sovereignty". In what follows, we will briefly present the ideas of Na’ini and then will focus on the theory of sovereignty.
Na’ini starts his argument with two common sense laws that both can be affirmed after a short reflection:
First Law: Will (iradah) of the free agent itself is not voluntary. Reflecting on the process of decision-making inside ourselves, we realize that after conceiving the act and affirming its benefit our will automatically comes into existence. Will is an inevitable outcome of conceiving the act and affirming its benefit. Na’ini says:
“Surely, all those qualities that belong to the soul such as will, conception and affirmation are not voluntary .”[11]
In respect to God, it can be demonstrated that His will is not voluntary, because his essence is simple and free from any attributes accidental and additional to it. Therefore, will cannot be accidental to His essence, since it is in conflict with the simplicity of the essence. Will of God is identical with His essence and this implies that the Divine will is essential and it is self-evident that essential attributes are not voluntary. We find in an exposition of Na’ini’s lectures that:
“Surely the will that is the complete cause of the existence of the effects is the same as His essence, and self-evidently His essence, the Exalted and the Glorified, is not voluntary for Him.”[12]
Second Law: Human soul has complete sovereignty and authority upon its voluntary acts. In other words, man always feels very clearly that has complete power to make his decisions regarding his voluntary acts. Na’ini writes:
“Surely, the soul has complete effect and authority on muscles without facing any obstacle in exercising its sovereignty.”[13]
Na’ini concludes that there must be something between the will (iradah) and act. He calls this element "ikhtiyar". Ikhtiyar is an act of soul that takes place after the formation of iradah and its prerequisites. In this way, Na’ini argues for his position and adds that it is the only solution for the well-known objection of Fakhr al-Razi, who asserted that voluntariness of an act implies its involuntariness, since voluntariness of an act means to be caused by the will, but the will itself is determined by causes that produce it necessarily. Na’ini responds to this objection by saying that the voluntary act is not caused by the will; rather it is caused by something, which occurs between the will and act, i.e. ikhtiyar (or talab). Ikhtiyar is not caused by the will; it is originated from the essence of the soul.
Na’ini believes that there is no necessary relation between ikhtiyar and the soul. Human soul in making ikhtiyar just needs some preponderating factor. For this it would suffice that the agent purses an end or goal in the act.
There are many objections to Na’ini’s theory. First, the difference between iradah and ikhtiyar is not known. If the ikhtiyar can escape cause-effect necessity why cannot iradah do this?
Second, Na’ini has not solved the problem in relation to the Divine acts, because ikhtiyar also cannot be additional to His essence and according to Na’ini himself the Divine essence is not voluntary for God. Now the question is: Does Na’ini believe that Divine acts are voluntary?! How does he treat the decisive and certain belief in His power and His willingness?
Third, is ikhtiyar or talab, which is the basis of Na’ini’s theory on voluntariness of acts contingent or necessary? Na’ini does not accept its necessity and takes it to be contingent. Therefore, it must have equal relations to both existence and non-existence and according to the law of impossibility of preference without a preponderant; it would be impossible for ikhtiyar to exist. There is no solution for this problem in Na’ini’s account.
( continue ...)
===================
good bye. take care.
Christina Litt lawyer of Loblaw Who also worked for Borden Ladner Gervias LLP was behind all theory of illegal misconduct and abuse of process using criminal to win their civil court claim while fighting Mitra Kermani more than two years finally she is disappeared and left both companies over her bad performance and by keep record of laying to too many courts and Elizabeth Margles VP. Communication and Loblaw spokeswoman of Loblaw company also left the Loblaw company for her bad performance by lying to National post wrong information. The truth was Mitra Kermani never convicted of criminal harassment. This was ugly dirty game for those lawyers to win not pay the claim to Mitra Kermani.
As last hearing from criminal court they send their amend endorsement said that Mitra Kermani never convicted of any criminal harassment and this is very unfortunate Loblaw counsel said that in civil court Mitra Kermani is convicted of Criminal harassment and all mental assessment from civil and criminal was dismissed not found any ground for mental assessment problems for her. Loblaw want to pay tort of defamation against unfairness they did to her in past two years The people who know Mitra Kermani supported her and never believe any of those story but criminal court in past two years found not guilt not even one evidence against her doing any illegal act during making the best halal products those only was hate crime from the group who hate Muslim and real halal food growth and some fraud manufactures who prefer to sell cheap fraud halal mix food but wrong products to Nofrill and Wal-mart and Food basic supermarkets and misconduct of their lawyers.
Still the some condition is under court of appeal
From civil claim point of view Loblaw are negotiate with Mitra Kemani’s new lawyer to find a settlement solution if both parties get agree upon still under review.
There was not ground for Justice McDonald court order and this is going to drop and damage of Mitra Kermani over breach contract and tort defamation ( calling Mitra Kermani all slander and waste her time for her defence more than two years in two courts) is going to pay by Loblaw companies ltd. Possible return of business of Misom halal food to the Loblaw supermarket is under review while existing halal group who are working by selling fraud halal food to Muslim in Loblaw supermarkets need to step back and instead of sell halal meat they suppose to sell only rice and potatoes!. With program of traceability Federal food label civil court easy can find those groups are doing fraud since 1998 did mix halal with nonHalal are: Pillers Sausages foods, Maple Lodge chicken and chicken wiener, Surefresh chicken foods and St. Helene beef using ISNA and IFANCA and Crescent brand foods. No more comments. The only company has worked honest for Muslim community in Canada is Misom halal food.
http://rjjago.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/who-are-canadas-most-important-progressive-muslims/
Who are Canada's most important progressive Muslims?
Employees of Misom halal food products
416-757-0660
The best 100% halal food in Canada
Post a Comment