Update: BC Civil Liberties Association applies for 3rd party intervener status in section 13 (1) court challenge.
In a sure sign of desperation The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal released two rulings late Friday before the long weekend in a pathetic attempt at damage control by hoping to limit public scrutiny.
Both rulings illustrate the contempt these out of control bureaucrats have for the public and further display the anti-democratic nature of the Canadian Human Rights Commission & the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.
Release No. 1 : Athanasios D. Hadjis Denies Intervener Status to Canadian Constitution Foundation in Lemire Case - says he is not interested in allowing further dissenting opinion.
Release No. 2 : Hadjis refuses disclosure requests in what may only be described as an unseemly effort to limit further damaging revelations of CHRC & CHRT wrongdoing, and limit exposure of the current allegations of corruption at the Canadian Human Rights Commission and Tribunal.
In possibly related news - The Canadian Human Rights Commission spys on blogger on long weekend after Tribunal decision revelations;)
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)








5 comments:
So BCF - are you going to out the buggers IP address so we can do some fun stuff?
It's right there in the in the stats jpeg in the post;)
ROB NICHOLSON: CLOSE THEIR DOORS, OPEN THEIR FILES TO JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE SCRUTINY!!
No, no bad blazing pale catfur,
the ones related to this depleted and deleted individual?
>>>KEvron said...
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
2:44 AM <<<
Seems that I am the only one that cannot read it's posts - pity. Did I miss anything?
Thought it could be a relay/echo from the Lying Jackel or Dawg - whom incidentally has been SOOOO silent about this development.
I do not delete posts as a rule but kevron has earned that dubious distinction. He posts multiple times in true troll like fashion - I have seen him kicked off of SDA for literally spamming comment threads.
Were he to limit his responses to single as opposed to multiple posts there might be a case to reconsider it. None of his comments were relevant to the post.
Post a Comment