My comment on Johnny Maudlins blog, I won't link to it but I do have a screen shot.
Blazing Cat Fur said...
You clearly took the Brown Acid didn't you Johnny?
"Mark Steyn has been under attack, of late, as is the Canadian magazine Maclean's, where he writes a regular column. Maclean's magazine published excerpts from Steyn's book and Mohamed Elmasry, the leader of the Canadian Islamic Congress, filed a complaint with the human rights commision, claiming that Steyn's writing exposes Muslims to hatred. Elmasry also named bloggers Kate McMillan and Kathy Shaidle, in his complaint. They are alleged to have re printed Steyn's column on their websites."
There you are making specious claims about the racism of others and you can't even get a few simple facts straight. For the record dead-head Kate and Kathy are not named in Elmasrys HRC complaint. God are you addled.
Here's Johnny....Just when you thought leftists couldn't get any stupider 
Thursday, May 08, 2008
The Lying Jackals maudlin sychophant speaks...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
30 comments:
You do have to admire his defence, though: admit you are a brain-damaged druggie upfront and people will pretty much say, "well, that's a brain-damaged druggie for you...".
Seriously, he suffers from the the Warren Kinsella "Nixon Syndrome", wherein he tries to "get" folks who have more on him than he has on them.
I mean, he shouldn't make fun of how Kathy looks then post a picture like this of his sister:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/65381711@N00/2355357181/
Gad that was horrible!
Maudlin as I had suspected really is brain damaged, I actually feel a wee bit bad for mocking him in retrospect. Still for someone who like his mentor Kinsella tosses the racist card indiscriminately - well he deserves to be made an ass of. The man has trolled on SDA, lying constantly, for months, pretending to speak with authority on mattters he clearly knows nothing about. What a fraud, what a liar, just like Kinsella.
He doesn't understand the concept of "making distinctions", especially when linked to intelligence.
He also is confused by the idea that a "stopped clock is correct twice a day", and wants to join the bandwagon.
Cheers
I'm thinking about a CHRC complaint Blazing...I mean I am an old hippie and I feel slighted each and every time someone suggests that the minor disability I may suffer from a couple of tabs of bad acid is brought up.
The fax machine is spooling up....
Good point, Jay. Matter of fact, he posted to kinsella about flunking out of school due to LSD and I thought, man, what a wuss...
Of course, it could all be a story designed to get a pat on the head from his idol.
LSD? Thought it was ADD!
Anyone who posts on the Lying Jackel's site is desperate.
I am not sure you have a case Jay but fax away I look forward to my appointment with infamy.
So, the two older guys are his mommy n dad?
JimN
Shed no tears for Johnny's dead brain cells my friends. Given what he's doing with the two or three neurons he has left, they rest of 'em deserved to die.
To wit: Mr Maudlin holds that there is no difference between violence done by the terrorist head choppers in Afghanistan and our troops who are hunting them. His "reasoning" is some kind of vague Zen/Hindu "violence is mean" mishmash.
A quick google of "Johnny Maudlin" "The Phantom" will reveal the extended "conversation" I had with the good Mr. Maudlin. It isn't really worth reading, as it consists mostly of me reminding him what we were talking about. Short memory, due to massive cell death no doubt.
The truth of the matter is that he craves attention and has a deep hatred of "squares". I'm trying to get him to comment on my blog so I can enjoy deleting it and ban him for life.
Its just how I feeeel about it.
Heh, either that or medical orderlies.
Undercover cops maybe? Nope, too soft 'n pudgy.
Who on earth publishes their family photos on the web for other people to make fun of? Is this some new kind of low class thing we're all supposed to just get used to, like binge drinking teens puking in the back yard at 4AM?
Phantom can you post a link for readers to your conversations with Maudlin, we would love to see it.
I see yet another mentally disturbed lefty has weighed in - none other than "Mass Graves" Dawg. I am at a loss as to how to describe his evident "condition". The man lacks any sort of normal moral filter.
Kids! Peanut butter and jelly sandwichs for all of you and a nap so that when you wake up you can create, with your box of crayons, more interesting ideas about posting family pictures and the rest...
I love my family. That's why. Get many visitors here, Fur? Looks pretty desolate and deserted to me.
Why don't leftist shave?
It does look like he bathed.
No problem, O Blazing One. Normally I don't send Johnny Butthead any traffic if I can help it because as you can see he gets off on it.
However as you ask:
http://johnnymaudlin.blogspot.com/2008/03/my-dear-friends-over-yonder-at-swell.html
Talking to this moron is annoying. I've had better conversations with house plants.
Hi Johnny, I see you were able to rouse yourself from your usual meds induced torpor.
Desolate and deserted? Sounds like projection Johnny, and come to think of it that also aptly describes your drug addled mind.
Thanks for the link Phantom!
Oh look, he posted!
Typical Maudlin logic here, "I love my family therefore I post unflattering photos of them so they can be mocked by people I hate."
If my sibling or parent did that to me I'd kick their ass, and so would the rest of the Phantom clan. I'll mention that to your mum if I see her, eh?
Wow I just read that post Phantom. It is really hilarious that the Lying Jackal must count on "allies" like Maudlin. Both are so desperate I am not sure which to pity more.
Yep. The K man is really scraping the bottom of the barrel, eh? Says a lot about both of them.
I pity his family, myself. I wonder if they know what they are involuntarily being associated with?
I don't know Blazing, I pretty much agree with your worldview, but aren't being a BIT over the top about Johnny M.
I mean, he does say that Steyn has "compelling statistics" or something, although in the end, J.M. doesn't agree with S.
Quite frankly, I'm not convinced by Steyn's case, either. I don't think he's an `Islamophobe' or whatever, but from what I understand, the fertility rate of Muslims in Europe and NOrth America collapses not long after they arrive in the `first world.'
Here's an example from my own experience. Growing up in Ottawa, I befriended a family whose parents had recently emigrated from Lebanon.
They had six children (one of whom did live to adulthood, as their little girl died from leukemia).
I haven't seen the sons that I chummed with in several years, but when I did see them, here's how many children they had:
first son: none
second son: one
third son: none
second daughter: none
fourth son: two
three children from a family of five children; and I think that's typical.
the failure of the current generation to replace themselves - between myself and my two brothers, there are only two children - may be a worry but it seems to affect all communities generally...
I'm not sure how old you are but remember when the computer genius William Shockley went around twenty years ago warning that `blacks on welfare' are having too many children compared to whites. Flash-forward to today: it turns out welfare mothers aren't replacing themselves either.
Keep up the good work, BCF - but rage can be a trap (take it from a rage junkie)
thanks
(I used to be Roundhead, now I'm just ol' flatop).
Hi Roundhead, good to see you again! I am not angry at Maudlin for disagreeing with Steyn or myself. What I do dislike is the cavalier habit both he and the Lying Jackal have of attempting to tar others with the term "Racist".
Dawg is guilty of same slimy tactic, but then again it has been a favourite method of the left for so long that the term no longer has meaning. You can yell wolf only so often.
alright BCF - I keep thinking of the chopper pilot on `Lost' when I see that picture...
RH-cum-FT
He does have a certain Post -Traumatic gaze doesn't he;)
The Phantom family? Do you all wear capes with a P emblazoned on the front. Phantom, you are a funny old guy. What happened in our discussion was that you failed to persuade me of your point of view.
That's all. That you are unable to accept that in a manly fashion is too bad. I don't claim to be right, about anything.
I do claim to report and observe in an objective way, from time to time. One of the reasons neither one or your pages (you and BCF) are not well read, and have so few visitors, is that neither one of you write with any objectivity all all.
Neither does Shaidle, by the way. Shaidle has the traffic she does because she goes out her way to offend and folks check that out the way they would a car wreck.
Phantom, all I can discern from your blog is that you are hard for the military. That's about it. Both of you are more recognizable as commentors on McMillan's and other blogs.
That's alright. Some are leaders, some are followers. No shame in being followers, either of you, but you may want to think a little harder about who you follow.
Shaidle is thoroughly discredited. No mainstream media source would touch her with a ten foot pole, and the very few small outlets that have would run like hell if challenged to defend their association with her rabid writings.
Sure Johnny, whatever you say, we know how credible your insight is;) I recommend you renew your prescriptions.
Johnny spracht: "I do claim to report and observe in an objective way, from time to time."
Sure Johnny, you claim objectivity but I doubt you'd know an objective fact if you tripped over one in the street. You dwell in the rubber Hippie universe where everything is relative. Nice rounded corners so you can't hurt yourself on unpleasant facts.
"What happened in our discussion was that you failed to persuade me of your point of view."
No, what happened was you've mistaken a basic moral premise as being merely my "point of view". It isn't. If you can't discern the difference between a murderer and the cop that shot him, you aren't a reasonable person. Meaning you don't reason.
Making your statement about objectivity all the more hilarious.
By the way, you are quite intensely WRONG about my interest in the military. I am interested in weapons and tactics, I consider our armed forces to be a slow motion train wreck.
The military disgusts me because in our country we have scumbag politicians making decisions that get people killed for political reasons . Example, we still don't have helicopters in Afghanistan.
The reason this is happening is that politicians and media pander to MORONS like yourself. People who can't make the moral distinction between a soldier and a terrorist. You do not deserve to have these men fight for you. If I had my way you'd be fighting for your own freedom your own self, and a fine job you'd make of it no doubt.
Here's an unpleasant question for your moral relativism. The tyrants who run Myanmar just got 100,000+ people killed because of a glorified rain storm, and may yet kill a lot more by with holding the aid that the rest of the world is clamoring to send them.
Question for you Johnny: If George W. Bush sent a B2 bomber over there and killed the lot of them with a daisy cutter, can you discern any moral difference between George and the tyrants? How about the guy who drops the bomb on them, any difference there?
If you can't, I'd advise you to seek spiritual guidance as soon as possible. Go read the Bhagavad Gita if you can't stomach the Bible, you'll find that the ancient peace loving Hindus agree with me, not you.
WTF Phantom, one question at a time, ok? Man, you are all over the map! What is the one central "fact" that you claim to have presented, the indisputably correct and unalterable fact? Because there was lots of POV. So tell me what the "fact" is and I'll be happy to revisit this fact.
Johnny, you can't read that post and discern a common thread? That IS one question.
See, that'd be why Kathy Shaidle entitled her post "Just when you thought Leftists couldn't get any stupider".
Read it again, maybe get the dictionary for the bigger words. I'm sure it will come to you. I'm not playing "explain it one more time to the poor drug addict" with you. Use your remaining neuron or shut the hell up.
Phantom
You see, what you are doing here is called "bullshitting". You haven't got a "fact". Have you? You have an opinion. A perspective. But not a fact. Here is an example of a fact, Phantom.
The insurgents were green pyjamas. If they wore black pyjamas, Phantom, and I stated they wore green pyjamas...well you probably follow that much, eh?
So, with regard to your failed attempt at persuading me of your world view, do you or do you not have a "fact" you would like to dispute?
Post a Comment