Listen to Ezra's interview with Syed on today's John Oakley show here.
Poor Syed is heard to whine to Ezra "You have been bullying me for 2 years", the frick'n lyin Islamist, to which EZ replies "You fool", heh.
Blazingcatfur has it on good authority that Ezra provided the shows producers with proof of the outstanding Law Society complaint prior to the show. Listen as Taqiyya Soharwardy denies the facts, and here we thought he had been reformed.
Also note that Richard Warman has 2 outstanding Law Society complaints against EZ, Serenity Vigna has 7! It is rumoured that a certain Lying Jackal of the CJC has 2 outstanding.
Thursday, August 07, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
17 comments:
Well, I just heard that shareep-creep, Sohardfarty, on John Oakley. And folks think that idiot is sorry?
What a disgraceful display. An ingrate immigrant of the worst degree.
Just recall what this shareep-creep has cost tax-payers. Think what damage he has done to the peace of the Levant family -- not to mention the huge cost to them.
Sohardfarty has painted a much more evil picture of his kind than most would have imagined.
What a creep! What a disgrace of decency.
That creep is sucking in countless naive Canadians against violence with his silly, sucking, slippery, paki-taqqiyya walk. What a horrible fraud that is! Talk about violence, that's about as criminal as violence gets.
Whats the difference: Beheading somebody, or filling their heads with poisonous, fraudulent, society-destroying nonsense? The former kills one; the latter ends up killing countless thousands.
May the fleas of a thousand camels infest his stinking armpits.
.
.
Ole Syed had a melt down when faced with the facts, Ezra only has to hand over a copy of this wack jobs complaints with the Alberta Law Society and this guy hasn't got an ounce of integrity left in Canada.
It appeared like he was threatening Ezra when he went into melt down molly mode. I'll need to listen to the link a few more times. Just but wow.
Thanks Blaze for posting the link, talk about a wakeup call.
Its really kind of sad, one had hoped he had seen the light.
Syed "Taqiyya" Soharwardy is a Goddamn Liar -
Isn't that the same as saying he is a Muslim?
Just asking.
Sorta like a double negative or somrthin..
Hi, I'm Denyse O'Leary, Toronto, and I blog at The Post-Darwinist , as well as The Mindful Hack and Colliding Universes.
I think our joint concerns are better served if we keep in mind that neither Soyarwardy nor any other Muslim immigrant invented the system that oppresses Canadians today.
He and others simply use the system that WE put in place.
I wish people would stop directing any attention - let alone attack - against the people who provide employment for liberal fascists merely by using the system. Direct it - please! - at the government in Ottawa that continues to uphold the system.
Suppose I belong to a religion that says cats are unclean. I charge the makers of a famous brand of toilet paper for offending me by their "fluffy white kitten" ads ...
The appropriate response is not to slang my religion but to assail the government for permitting a situation where my ideas have suddenly acquired such power in the land - where in a normally functioning country they never would.
One outcome of freedom of religion (= believe what you want) is that people will believe a variety of things. The government of such a country must avoid becoming the judge of religion that the Human Rights Commissions clearly wish to be.
If only, every time we got mad at a foolish complainant, we directed our attention to demanding that the system be dismantled instead!
Absent the system, the foolish comlainant is just someone with an opinion, and we've always allowed that.
6:29 AM
PS: I deleted my earlier comment due to missing words. - d
You're not wrong, Denyse, but we can do both. Not calling out immigrants (or anyone else) who take advantage of a stupid system is that bigotry of low expectations thing.
It is (perhaps not) amazing that immigrants from illiberal societies home in on these leftist 'institutions' so surely. No doubt it is one of the things that endear them to the left, even if they lean toward the misogynistic, anti-gay, atheist hating bigotry.
Yes, Brett, but consider this: A hypothetical person from an illiberal society does not know who is going to win in Canada.
If his experience of Canada was formed by the leftist establishment and its media, he would be right to assume that Canada is becomming an illiberal society, and safety lies in getting identified as a "victim" in the rapidly growing nanny state.
Attacking such people accelerates the process by encouraging them to identify with Nanny.
Remember, they don't know that a better way actually worked for decades, and was subverted by leftists because the leftists could not force their more despicable policies on a freer society. These include policies that traditinalist new immigratns are very opposed to.
All I am saying is, start with people where they are - and focus the hostility on the government that cynically sells out our heritage to please people for whom destroying people's lives is fun and profit.
just think, the very heritage that our new immigrants wanted to get in on!
bcl: Its really kind of sad, one had hoped he had seen the light.
Now, you didn't really think that, did you?
How do you know a Muslim is practising taqiyya? His lips are moving.
Heh good one Mariposa, well I had hope, tempered with caution as well however.
First - I completely agree with Denise and her analysis, even though I come from the other end of the religious spectrum. Well expressed!
Second - what 'light' was it that we had thought this Imam had seen? There are several possible answers.
It would have been rash to think he would have seen the 'light' that everyone MUST be able to speak their mind because that makes for a better society. Yet, that would not have been the only positive outcome here.
'Seeing the light' that oppressive laws he can use against others can also be used against him - THAT is more likely the light he had seen.... and I, for one, would have been quite happy had he seen that we apply laws equally here. I just wish someone would actually apply laws equally, so we can show him.
Well, I normally agree with Denyse when it comes to things scientific, and, in most of what she writes in things religious.
If she came over here for a visit and coffee I'm almost sure I could change her thinking on this one -- a little bit, at least.
It all is somewhat esoteric but has to do with the Christian "theory" of law and grace. Specifically, law on its own is not sufficient, reason on its own is not sufficient. Observation on its own is not enough to provide a basis for prediction.
Solzhenitsyn wrote a little about that bit of goodness left in the heart of the most wicked. RC theologians have tended to dwell on the combination of conscience together with the observations of the natural world in its astounding complexity and beauty. The bottom line is that no matter what the culture or society, no matter what the circumstances, people have no excuse when it comes to some basic "rules" of decency, truth, or fair play. St. Paul wrote about it.
Sohardfarty demonstrated this sort of thing very clearly when confronted by Ezra Levant on the John Oakley show. It was VERY obvious he knew he was lying. It takes Mohammedans some effort to prove why taqqiyya suits their purposes.
So to call somebody, anybody, on their premeditated transgressions against the universal graces such as decency and truth and fair play is not an improper thing to do. In fact, I would argue it is the proper and decent thing to do. It is the Christian thing to do because it seeks truth rather than revenge. It seeks truth rather than selfish pacifism.
The Mohammedan army of loathsome, ingrate immigrants needs to be directed back to that bit of goodness that is hiding somewhere inside them. To let them trample on that goodness with their Islamic, mad, mendacity is suicide.
The Christian hymn is not "Onward Christian Wimps".
Typically, "turning the other cheek" has been misinterpreted. Simply, it means we should not seek revenge.
Denyse, you need to come for coffee. Bring Deborah with you. We'll even give you dinner. We're just "nobodys". You are celebrities -- many people read what you write.
Read the Moscow Patriarchate's Social Concept Document, particularly the section on War and Peace in reference to Mohammedans and Christians.
Noel, I am not coming for a friendly coffee at your house if you insist on referring to the person whose behaviour we are discussing as "Sohardfarty."
I believe he is entirely mistaken, but I also know that the line between good and evil runs through the human heart.
When I say that he may not well understand the situation he has landed in, I do not mean to excuse him of evil, as God would recognize it. That is between him and God.
We are not in a war between nations, but in a struggle for the soul of our nation.
Our chief enemies are not people who acknowledge the supremacy of God and the rule of law, but people who do not believe in God and have no time for the laws that restrain the evils that their desires urge on them (= radical leftists).
Hi Denyse:
Too bad, I thought you might. Maybe you didn't listen to that radio show where the shareep-creep displayed his ugly colours so plainly for all to witness.
IMO, to transfer his actions and words of evil to some confessional of his making is not a very Biblical approach to Jesus' tough love.
We are not in a war against nations? We are in a struggle for the soul of our nation? I'm almost writeless on that one! I guess I read the wrong books and newspapers and journals.
"Our chief enemies are not people who acknowledge the supremacy of God and the rule of law, but people who do not believe in God and have no time for the laws that restrain the evils that their desires urge on them (= radical leftists)."
Er, um, now I know any coffee time, etc. would be totally insufficient. In my 50 years of theology research I never came to that conclusion. Who were Jesus' real enemies? Have you read Chesterton? Charles William? George MacDonald? Solzhenitsyn?
Anyway, you DO write so much good stuff, and you are to be commended for it! It's not the time and place here to bicker over esoterica.
What's more acceptable, a generation of vipers (in that ancient context) or a generation of hard farters (in this generation's context)?
Denyse, BCF (and the rest of us) are attacking that piece of filth Syed Soharwardy.
I put the following comment on the wrong post:
Not seeing Syed Soharwardy attacked, called a scumbag, and drummed out of polite society would be another crime against the woman in his mosque who have been beaten up for criticizing his running of it.
It is those women we want to encourage, and keeping politely coy about a sh*t stain like Soharwardy is not the way to do it.
I am not sure that further discussion of this issue would be productive, so let me simply restate my own position: Attacking individual complainants is a waste of time. They have no power to destroy their fellow citizens' lives except what Stephen Harper's government continues to give them.
The "human face" of fascism - smiles every time free speechers get distracted this way.
Post a Comment