Last day to vote at The Infidel Blogger Awards - Polls close at 6 pm EST - Vote Early Vote Often For Your Fave Infidels!
This is it your last chance to vote. Make it a good one. Winners wil be announced tomorrow - amidst much anticpated controversy.
Voting For "The Georgies" AKA The Infidel Blogger Awards, Ends Thursday Nov 20th and the Winners will be Announced Friday Nov 21st!
Vote Early Vote Often For Your Fave Infidels!
I'm sorry Blaze I adore your blog but you aren't an offensive Infidel yet.
So sorry I voted for Five Feet of Fire opps I mean Fury.
Live long and prosper.
No problem I will just try harder;)
I was in the same dilemma as Rose.
But it is getting crowded out there :)
ps..Rose - I think I maligned you on Jay's site (used your name and not Sue's) but tried to correct it.
As I say, getting crowded by a certain group who show up en mass and incognito and play grade school games.
Well, BCF, I voted for you early, as Biggest Section 13 Target, but I couldn't vote often -- I guess it's set up for one click, one vote.
Was shocked and pleased to see myself nominated!! If you had a hand in that, many thanks, you absolutely made my day :) I'm not as focused as other bloggers on specifically the Islamist insanity, but I'm sure enough firmly in the camp. What an honor to be nominated :)
Now, what has to happen is a Champion of Free Speech Award. If that ever happens, it would be mighty tempting to hunt down someone good at IT to help me get around that one click, one vote thing and GET BCF IN :) -- if you ask me, not only are you an excellent infidel, but, bar none, no one has been more steadfast in the fight against Section 13. (Yes, even Ezra -- whereas he focuses on his own particular issues, you stay on top of the WHOLE issue.)
Of course, if you threw cash my way for the phony votes, I'd turn around and start up a Defend Blazing Cat Fur Fund, for when you finally do become a target of the "CHRC," which I see as only a matter of time ;)
SK wrote: ps..Rose - I think I maligned you on Jay's site (used your name and not Sue's) but tried to correct it.
Sniff I'm shock and horrorfied, because I'm not that kind of girl who'd partake of a maligned threesome.
"Sniff I'm shock and horrorfied, because I'm not that kind of girl who'd partake of a maligned threesome."
Well hopefully at least not of that threesome. The Wulfpack I calls dem.
Blaze, the comments on the Pro-Censorship Asshat category are wild! There seems to be alot of pent-up emotion about LGF. But are these "Georgies" meant to be Canadian? And although this Charles Johnson seems to be rather choosy about how he moderates his comments, isn't it his blog? Complaining about the comments isn't so different than the Sock Puppets demanding a 5,000 word rebuttal on someone elses magazine. And really, can anyone compare in pro-censorship pedigree to the illustrious Bernie Farber Barbara Hall and Mohammed Elmasry?These people are the who's who of censorship, the creme de la creme of useful idiocy.
I agree Max and stated as much in the comments. It's his blog he can ban who he wants. I put him in as a lark having no idea the amount of controversy that would result - I was never a big follower of LGF so while I had heard rumours of his nuttiness I just had no idea of the scope.
At any rate what started as a lark will now have to be dealt with. I'm thinking I will blame the need for a co-winner in that category on being snookered by Jennifer Lynch - who I will claim recommended CJ;)
Yea blame the CHRC, snicker.
SK wrote: Well hopefully at least not of that threesome. The Wulfpack I calls dem.
LOL, I have nightmares that I'm on a plane in the middle seat with Lucy in the window seat and Lying Jackal in the isle. I can't image anything more horrorfying.
Yeah, I done a dub thing: I nominated Charles Johnson as Asshat of the Universe, not realizing it should be restricted to Canadian asshats. And I see just how dumb the thing is because when i went to the now close ot 400 comments, 200 of which I actually read, I see that none of them are about me being far and away the leader of the most likely to be headed for a beheadin' for posting Mohammed cartoons. Damn. When I saw the number up to 380 comments, I thought for certain they'd all be about me. But that's what you get from life: you're a nice guy, and you finish last.
Well, let me try this on the Internet, since the lady I was talking to told me only it works here and not in person: I'm a 6 foot, 3 inch 30 year old muscle guy with a Jaguar and a large bank account from an important and exciting job with the government (which I can't talk about.) I'm particularly attractive and very good in bed.
Thanks to all those who voted for my anti-Mohammed obnoxiousness, and I hope to outdo myself in the future, should I have one, given that I outdid myself already.
Eowyn, I voted for you as well. Tough call. Lots of great competitors.
Blaze, that is a fine idea you've made here.
My best to all.
Dag.
Dedicated to Barbara Hall & Jennifer Lynch -- a performance to cinch the Infidel Blogger Award. go to: http://poetency.blogspot.com/2008/11/wal-wartyr-dedicated-to-barbara-hall.html
"Sniff I'm shock and horrorfied, because I'm not that kind of girl who'd partake of a maligned threesome."
Well hopefully at least not of that threesome. The Wulfpack I calls dem.
>>