MPP Lisa Macleod to Human Rights Cultist Richard Moon: "I didn't call you in to make accusations and call people liars."
Richard Moon has evidently flipped out of orbit upon his belated realization that most people know the HRC Cabal to be a genuine threat to individual freedom. Moon attacks Ezra and calls HRC critics liars, among other baseless accusations in this National Post report. Essentially Moon has resorted to making stuff up as he goes along, this is par for the course for the human rights cultists. It's no wonder he had to phone in his contribution to the OHRC review - how could anyone keep a straight face spouting his Moon-Shine?
Among his more bizarre pronouncements Moon claims he found no evidence of personal malfeasance by CHRC staff during the course of his research - not surprising, it wasn't part of his mandate. The CHRT transcripts tell a far different tale, one of misleading testimony, evidence tampering and abuse of process.
Richard Moon I grant your wish - return to a well deserved obscurity.
A well deserved obscurity and irrelevance after going down in a blaze of buckshot. Perhaps he can join the Journalism doctor:)
"Lying Jackel" fails to include the little part of Moon getting slapped silly by MP Lisa MacLeod.
Not surprisingly, he hints at a complaint to the Alberta Law Society at the same time as the BC MP calls for his resignation.
Deflection by design.
Given the forward planning and mutual backscratching common between bureaucrats and members of academe, would it be too cynical to expect that Perfesser Moon might be offered the opportunity to implement his report as head of some HRC?
The reports of his input in Toronto this week seemed to suggest that he was more concerned about refuting any suggestions that he was some sort of "rat" with a lack of respect for those fine civil servants and academic hangers on toiling unceasingly in the bowels of the various HRC industries to hold the tolerance line across this racist and hate plagued hell called Canada.
That's a very good point Marcus his whole screed has a desperate feel to it, especially in light of the fact that none of allegations are based on fact. Despite calling for Section 13(1)'s repeal his report did call for further Stalinist erosion of freedoms however. He is a lefty, the ideology of nanny state trumps all for his type.
It gets worse:
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/585012
What a nightmare JA.
For your more intelligent readers, this site will serve as general refresher course of the lies, half--truths and mis-truths.
http://bouquetsofgray.blogspot.com/2009/02/two-cases-in-point.html
Thats pathetic Mitka, really there is no other word for it. Staff and others close to the CHRC have been caught red handed as a result of their own CHRT testimony providing misleading testimony and tampering with evidence and this is all you can offer? Bouguets of Greys posts deserve an A for effort but like the RCMP and Privacy Commission they prove nothing conclusive - to suggest otherwise is simply an effort to dissemble the truth.
I do not understand you Mitka, how is it that you possess the gaul to presume it is your right to undermine the free speech rights of your fellow citizens. You are one mixed up individual.
Mixed up? Man you are a piece of work. In your very own post you admit that both the RCMP and the privacy commissioner found no wrong-doing. No charges were ever laid ...but noooo YOU BCF are above the law....you know more than the RCMP and the Privacy Commissioner combined and you KNOW that the staff at the CHRC committed wrong-doings. You are unbelieveable!!! Thankfully now as a result of the front page story in the National Post others will realizethe extent of the smears you tried to carry out.
Mitka the RCMP found a convenient way to drop their investigation claiming a lack of jurisdictional authority. The Privacy Commission is on record as stating that they did not investigate the " how", meaning the mechanics of the the hijack - for you to state otherwise is bullshit plain and simple.
The Transcripts don't lie Mitka - The CHRC switched evidence and gave misleading testimony under oath. Really your partisanship has reduced you to a caricature, here's the link read it and weep.
http://www.socon.ca/or_bust/?p=873
If what you say is true then charges would have been laid. No charges BCF, you are a liar, face it!!
No one has launched a specific action yet, silly Mitka. There is a lot of "Discovery" that needs to be addressed by certain litigious parties. You are spinning out of control, I suggest you take a deep breath and step back from the keyboard.
Mitka: learn the difference between a lie (a deliberate untruth) and a mistake (which remains to be seen).
It might make your life a little less stressful.
One could also say that because CHRC employees haven't yet sued Steyn, they have no case...
If anyone needs to step back from the keyboard catfur its you not Mitka. What needle are you dancing on? Mitka is 100% correct and you are trying to do spin control and failing badly.
The RCMP are our National police. Do you think it is controlled by the CHRC? What fantasy world do you live in? The only conspiracy here is in your warped imagination. Your unwillingness to let go of the Ezra teet makes you look like a sycophant. If the police refuse to lay charges, if the Privacy Commisioner tells us there were no rules broken and then Moon follows with his condemnation of Ezra in the minds of most decent people its ball game over. That you continue to grasp at straws is pathetic.
Your argument is entirely specious Sue. In fact every argument you have ever presented is specious - I guess it stems from the belief in your own exceptionalism - that you get to decide just what rights I may have and to what degree I am allowed to exercise them.
Give your head a soak Sue.
Sue: what "ball game"?
The CHRC/T process is going to change.
Now, do you think it is changing because:
1) it needs changing; or,
2) just because?
Now if you believe 1), then perhaps you can tell us if you thought it needed changing, say, five years ago?
Or if it needs changing at all.
THEN, perhaps, and I'm asking nicely here, can you give us the impetus behind the change. Please.
"its ballgame over"
-gosh, you have to see the world through the lens of careerist competition to reduce a question of citizen free speech to that metaphor. Looks like an interested bureaucrat to me: how dare the taxpayers' protest our incompetence and hatred of them!
Actually, the RCMP, or any police force, is under no obligation to pursue all breaches of the law. That would be a practical impossibility so their judgment how to best use their resources is a recognized part of the job. If someone in the force were giving the officers involved the idea, or if they had it themselves, that it would be a bad use of scarce resources to spend time investigating "human rights" bureaucrats for being a little too, ahem, spirited in pursuit of justice, when the RCMP have been asked only to investigate one precise question of wifi hijacking, it would be easily understood by the officers involved. All policing requires a certain level of trust that officers will not go after each other for anything less than clear and serious breaches of the law. They have to cut each other slack or they couldn't do their jobs and rely on each other in touch situations. And so, when the CHRC has created a cozy "policing" relationship with various police forces, well then...
What a nightmare JA.
>>