Hadjis CHRT ruling in Warman v. Lemire expected Sept. 2nd
Well this should be interesting as a favourable ruling for Lemire will effectively end the Section 13 (1) Constitutional Challenge.
My bet is a favourable ruling. There's an awful lot to hide.
...
Jay has more.
I so love it (Paton over carnage?). This is a LOSE - LOSE or translated "No-Win" situation for the CHRC/CHRT and in particular DND.
I followed the link to Connie's comments and her posting of the AG rep's (Fotheringham?) suggestion was hilarious.
For so many of the other intervenors such as CJC, BB and others - it is a critical, credibility and teaching moment for their notable denounciation related to any role (financial or otherwise) they ever played in the abuse of process = is deafening.
WHAT will the ARC, Dawg or BCL have to say about this?
BCF, Connie and Mark, Jay, you and many others especially Ezra and Steyn have changed history no matter how this turns out.
I did not mention Lemire until the last as he has withstood the entire weight of a corrupt and tainted bureacracy and think (as did Dr. S over at Jay's site)(and as part of the old not-forgotten "Heritage Front Affair) he is not only entitled to payment of legal expenses but substantive damages due to a few very brave & special people.
Thus because of links, connections, evidence, liability -
LEMIRE must and WILL be found GUILTY.
Bring on DISCLOSURE!
It will be interesting regardless of outcome.
Is this, for much the same reasons, also a lose-lose for Stephen Harper?
I suspect as much either way, if he continues to ignore it, well we shall see.
Did I read this right? Has Hadjis taken almost a full year after closing arguments to return his decision?
What on earth would justify such a delay? Forcing the parties to wait such a long time seems both inefficient and cruel, and not in the interests of justice.
Justice you say? Bollocks;)
I agree with Blaze, justice ballocks. What really gets my knickers in a knot is Lamire can't sue any of those involved. according to CHRC act respondants can't retailiate via any venue and they failed to ensure that respondants had any rights or protection from malicious prosecution. Or am I wrong?
Harper's Justice Minister will wear this case like a hair shirt regardless of the outcome. His silence speaks volumns to moi.
A lot is going to depend on how the Member writes his decision. I have a hard time believing that he will have taken a year to write "Complaint does not meet test in Taylor, dismissed." Though I suspect the coward Lynch is on her knees hoping he does.
If, as he should he dismisses on the merits and on the gross misconduct on the part of CHRC staff and their Complainant - Vigna was not unserene for nothing - Lemire might have a basis for some sort of abuse of process suit.
It is a lose/lose for Harper and, frankly, the chickenshit deserves it. Essentially he, and the PMO are petrified that if they were to do the right thing and repeal s. 13.1 the Jackal, Bernie and the Toronto Star would whip up immigrant frenzy. First, I don't think for a second that the vast majority of Canada's immigrants are that dumb. Second, the ones who are are already voting NDP or Liberal. So the pandering is as pointless as it is unprincipled. The CPC knows better and frankly they deserve to wear Lemire win or lose.
Maybe Lucy will sue the Member if he says one, single, mean thing about him. That would be fun.
>>