Brian Lilley: MSM Mocks Parents Concerns Over McGuinty's Perverse Ontario Sex Ed Curriculum
This is what the MSM thinks about parents concerns over Dalton McGuinty's Gay Agenda for school children.
Especially troubling was the National Post's spineless cowering - ‘Oh yeah baby (cough)’: Official Gays come on National Post’s face; National Post pretends to like it!
Hey National Post guess what.
They still don't respect you this morning.
Vote - But Not For McGuinty.
Charles Adler & Christina Blizzard: Dalton McGuinty's Transgender Hooking For Kids Curriculum
Especially troubling was the National Post's spineless cowering - ‘Oh yeah baby (cough)’: Official Gays come on National Post’s face; National Post pretends to like it!
Hey National Post guess what.
They still don't respect you this morning.
Vote - But Not For McGuinty.
Charles Adler & Christina Blizzard: Dalton McGuinty's Transgender Hooking For Kids Curriculum




NP has also turned into a bunch of butt-sniffers as of late.
[... I actually used to like reading NP, but nowadays, there's so much better stuff to spend my time reading their bullshit stories.]
It has really gone downhill since the ownership change.
Gee, what has Hudak said about this controversy. Can some one please drag him out from under the bed and ask him?
Those posted twits' tweets are just recycled CBC stuff. They really are a bunch of posers. They must be the trees that make the forest that CBC Georges StromboDiva spoke so eloquently about at TIFF.
My local candidate came to my door last night. He seems a good man. I asked why Hudak has chosen not to take a stand on anything, Hudak does not seem to realize that as a result he comes across as weak. Discussing the TDSB Mosqueteria etc I was told they did not want to offend the Muslims. I kid you not.
Sadly typical of media "betters".
Hudak took a stand on sex ed months ago. Sex ed of this nature is not appropriate for young children. He said 6 year old kids are still learning to tie their shoes. I agree. Puberty is soon enough to discuss these matters. This is not an insult to any adult. I have no issues whatsoever with GLBT.
Dear Tabatha Southey: Who is "we?" And can you acknowledge that "you" are not "everyone," and that not everyone wants to raise their children like you raise yours? Also, how do you debunk something that, despite some unfortunate spelling mistakes and some poor font choices (yeah, I'll give that to the Post's "funny guy") is pretty much an accurate description of the TDSB's sex ed program.
Oh has he repeted that stand since the election began? I haven't heard a word, like on so much else he has remained silent.
Perhaps now he can reiterate that again, “loudly”. This seems like the perfect opportunity for someone that is serious.
Hehe great minds think alike, they say.
They cha amongst themselves and in their arrogance assume they represent us all, astonishing isn't it.
"Bitters"?
I'm sure Tabatha Southey was a guest on Farm Film Report being interviewed by Big Jim McBob and Billy Sol Hurok
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvHGW468n44&feature=related
That latest study out opines more kids are having unprotected sex than their predecesors, so much for sex ed reducing teenage sex or teaching our youth to have protected sex. Looks like the progressives have indoctornated our youth into the "Anything goes if if feels good crowd" and we'll pay the costs literally.
Yes we will.
Heh;)
They didn't want to 'offend' the muslims who are only 5% of the Toronto's population.
Yup, that was the decision of the Hudak brain trust as I read the candidates reply.
Got you linked up on this over at my place...
Nice coverage. This stuff is unreal. My youngest is ten and I asked if he knew what a transsexual was, and he had no clue. Good thing, I guess, since he's not getting all that stuff at school. He said he liked being a boy and didn't want to change.
It's becoming increasingly evident to anyone watching the demographic collapse occurring in the developed world that a society that wants to survive, and support its growing ranks of elderly in old age, should be encouraging people, when still reasonably young, to settle down and have families without spending much time in the identity-confused sexual free-for-all that has been the norm in the West since the 1960s (identity-confused whether or not you are heterosexual or unequivocably "gendered").
Are the people pushing this hyper-sexualization agenda just so angry that they want to destroy society, that their Utopian vanities and sacrificial religion need never be questioned, or do they still think someone somehow is going to be supporting them in old age and would give up the agenda if they had to realize there won't be sufficient children to pay their bills? And then they make fun of the immigrants with children who are their last best hope for keeping the economy going? I wonder how long it's going to be before politicians in the nth year of the coming depression start advocating signifcantly higher taxes for childless people with financial resources. This kind of thing can't go on forever.
unequivocally
It is a form of nihilism I suspect Trupeers, and it is pathological.
Tsk, tsk … some parents still refuse to train properly their children. How will he cope?
Cheers
Something is terribly wrong here. I'm sure 90% of the parents out there if they were clued in would revolt because of this.
How do they grade or show that billy/susy passed or knows his/her transgender handbook/training.
Billy got an A in Anal sex...
how the hell did 1.5-3.0 percent of the population get to dictate their lifestyle to the rest of the population.
Shouldn't the schools stick to Math, reading, writing etc instead of trying to brainwash them with sociogaylestrannism. WTF?
how the hell did 1.5-3.0 percent of the population get to dictate their lifestyle to the rest of the population.
A MSM filled with militant gays. With a totally depraved ideology.
I wonder if suing the TDSB is an option.
YOU SICK,SICK,SICK PARENT BASTARDS,MAY YOU ALL ROT IN HELL with your homo/transgendered B.S !!!! And to HELL WITH YOU TOO TDSB !!! YOU ARE ALL JUST OXYGEN THIEVES ,SO JUST DO US ALL A FAVOR AND DROP DEAD!
Tell us how you really feel....
The radical leftists have control of the school board and they push a gay agenda on unwitting children and parents, you have to cut the head off this snake and that means the TDSB and OISE.
GBLT and all that goes with it is an issue for parents to discuss or not discuss, as they choose, with their children.
The meme that teachers have to do what parents don't do is a crock -- especially when it comes to social issues. School is for the learning of reading, writing, and arithmetic, not for the indoctrination of students into every new-fangled, militant social issue of the week.
Insisting that students grapple with complex social issues, often way beyond their pedagogical and emotional capacity, is abusive of the student and intrusive of the family unit, which appears to be the intention of the radical social engineers who insist that everyone be on their wavelength -- and to Hell with parents' wishes and values for their children. 'Dontcha know that in the social engineers' world, students belong to the state, not the parents?
'Brave new world, I think it's called. Forward to the Dark Ages is what I call it. Students and their parents are the new serfs.
As for Hudak's ineptitude: This was his election to lose and he's doing an exceptionally good job of it. Like McGuilty, he's nowhere to be seen or heard. The provincial Conservatives "don't want to offend Muslims"? In not offending Muslims, whose Mosqueterias are breaking the law, they're alienating and offending far more law-abiding citizens than the 5% of Muslims who live in Ontario.
Being a career politician seems to have dulled Mr. Hudak's political blade. He seems not to be able to cut through the McGuinty crap, something he has to do to win this election.
I'm depressed: Four more years of Duhlton McGuilty is almost too much to contemplate.
I wrote to a friend recently, re cancelling subscriptions to the National Post: With respect, your problem isn't with the National Post butwith the unshakeable belief on the part of so many traditionalCanadians that "conservative" today usually means anything more than"coyote to the Liberals' wolf."The strategy traditionals need to free ourselves includes reliance onthe new media, no support for the old, and no mercy on politicians whoattempt to suppress free speech.Oh and one other thing: Whenever a politician's flack phones me, Imake clear that I - as a traditional Canadian - do not want hiscandidate to spend money on us and ours. You see, too often, themessage the conservative politician gets is: Don't spend money on themand theirs. Spend it on us and ours. My point is that mygrandchildren will be enslaved to pay for spending, whether it is onthem and theirs or us and ours. So I really want them to stop.Conservative hacks and flacks get right off the phone at that point,thank God. Which tells you something, doesn't it. - cheers, d.
Good point Denyse.
Sdaly it seems now that the Hudak Braintrust thought they could coast to victory solely on the anti-McGuinty vote hence the completely characterless,convictionless, principleless campaign we have witnessed. The end result is that Hudak appears to stand for nothing, his acquiessence to the Islamicisation of public schools was described as an effort "not to offend muslims" by my local candidate. Hudak does not deserve to win on that alone.
>>