Blazing Cat Fur: John Oakley Show: Charles McVety vs. The Bitchy Whiner Who Wants To Censor SunTV

John Oakley Show: Charles McVety vs. The Bitchy Whiner Who Wants To Censor SunTV

My God but Erickson is a sickening whiner.

Thank Sdmatt for the vid.

jzaik – – (8:34 PM): We've got one of these radical gays too. Kevin Jennings was a homo activist that wanted to indoctrinate kids into the gay agenda.

The guy worked in the messiah's administration at some level.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Jennings

He had to resign. Along with all the other radicals found in any leftist administration.

See, my lovely mother (Who believes that 50% of the population is gay and that they're born this way) never sees any of this crap. Only what's on that Woman's daytime TV block about how beautiful and nice homosexuality is.
Blazingcatfur – – (8:48 PM): Damn that Oprah! Jennings is just like that guy.
Adrienne – (8:58 PM): Ugh!
Blazingcatfur – – (9:22 PM): He eleicits that sort of response I notice.
perspectives – – (10:59 PM): Thanks for the video SDAMatt.

Erickson LIED when he stated suicide is the number 1 cause of death among teens, it's not. Suicide is the second leading cause with females being 3 times more likely than males to attempt; however, males are more likely to actual die during an attempt.

The highest suicide rate age group for males is between 20 -24 years of
age which is after they are out of the public school system, so school bullying
can not be an attributing factor in these suicides.

Suicide rates among teens greatly increased after 1961 correlating with the feminist movement, the beginning of the sexual revolution, and the resulting breakdown of the family unit.

Also, teen suicide rates in Canada, where the gay lifestyle is more
acceptable, is HIGHER than that of the USA.

One could conclude, using Erickson's own logic, that the LGBTQ educational agenda, just like anti-depressants, are more likely to contribute to teen suicide attempts then they are to alleviate them.

So out of 219 pages of curriculum, Erickson claims he only wrote 8 pages, yet is named as the LE AD writer despite the fact only 2 other writers are named. Makes one wonder what sort of whining he did to be named lead writer if he wasn't and what sort of fellow would take credit for something he himself has alluded to not being true.

If he's willing to falsify statistics, what other content is falsified?

http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/BP/bp236-e.htm#1.%20Gender
Bob Almighty – – (11:28 PM): I had a few words with about 50 trustees and education officials about this curriculum and I must say it didn't go too well.
Revnant Dream – – (11:35 PM): Well & rationally put. This guy is a total liar, a fanatic to a cause that is sickening. The grooming of children for sexualized use. A sick puppy.
@9 years ago the RCMP would have flagged this guy as a danger to society.Now he teaches the most vulnerable.
Revnant Dream – – (11:35 PM): 20 years
Blazingcatfur – – (11:38 PM): They don't like having the sunlight shone on their depraved agenda.
cizi – – (12:26 AM): I couldn't make it through the 200 plus page slog, but noted on page six that the Homophobia and Heterosexism resource guide is based on factually incorrect and misinformed premises. The guide reports that a) 1 person in 10 is LGBTQ, and b) sexual orientation does not predispose a greater or lesser risk of contracting HIV. This information is referenced to the Elementary School Teachers Federation of Ontario!

However, the Centre for Disease control reports that "Gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with other men (MSM) represent approximately 2% of the US population, but account for 57% of new HIV infections; in Canada,, the latter number in 2010 was 51%. Such increased risk has been evident since the beginning of the AIDS epidemic in the eighties, and indeed, has increased in the past few years (relative to the early 2000's)

Such a 2500% (USA)or at least 500%(Canada) increase in risk of infection is not at all trivial, and if teachers are truly to be involving themselves in these matters for reasons of student health and safety, they should at least have valid numbers to assist their "guidance" in these matters.

I was gobsmacked to see that people such as Anne Frank, George gershwin, William Shakespeare, Isack Newton, da Vinci, Michelangelo were listed as "significant international LGBTQ individuals". All that's required to get on the list is what??
keyboardtapper – – (1:28 AM): Excellent points! And yet Erickson stated that truth and safety is why the curriculum is mandated.

Everything Erickson has written and stated is provably false by reputable sources. The level of deceit and hypocrisy perpetrated by him is astonishing.

The LGBTQ information is solely based on self reporting by said community.
keyboardtapper – – (1:29 AM): Correction 5 writers not 3.
perspectives – – (1:34 AM): Correction 5 writers contributed not 3.
Blazingcatfur – – (6:18 AM): Very true.
Blazingcatfur – – (6:21 AM): I posted on that previously, they continue to propagate that lie among many other whoppers you point out.
Black Mamba – – (8:20 AM): @11, Erickson says "I've obviously supported freedom of speech". Yes, yes, obviously.@11

Look, is it not possible that emotionally disturbed kids are more likely to a)attempt suicide and b)decide they might be gay? Correlation doesn't equal causality.
dogwonder – – (8:42 AM): Gawd I couldn't listen to his leftwing progressive bull=shite, gawd talk about over emotive BS. Where'd he get his suicide stats, did he just make up that 50 percent are gay?
Blazingcatfur – – (9:04 AM): Erickson supports free speech like all pseudo-leftists support free speech - only his opinions are allowed.
Blazingcatfur – – (9:04 AM): Much of the tripe he's peddling in the grooming guide he helped write is made up.
1389 – (9:28 AM): Even if gays have a much higher suicide rate than others, could it be that they are prone to suicide because they are seriously messed up in the head to begin with, and not because anybody else is persecuting them?
acartia – – (9:31 AM): All of these comments talk about how Erickson is over the top and states incorrect facts to support his view-point. I don't know enough about the facts to comment on them other than to say that some of his numbers appear overstated to me.

This being said, I didn't hear any comments about McVety. This is Charles McVety, a man with questionable credentials, a man who has repeatedly used incorrect facts to support his twisted view of life. A man who's TV show was removed because he refused to obey an ethical and conduct code that he had previously agreed to. A man who claims to represent Canadian Values, when he does not. A man who uses the unethical practice of using misleading internet addresses to get his view point across (charlesdarwin.ca, richarddawkins.ca).
Bearspaw – – (10:36 AM): Just their nether regions.
Bearspaw – – (10:39 AM): Probably. Remember Kinsey's bogus "10" percent meme. It took decades to discredit that number.
Bearspaw – – (10:40 AM): Yet this unreasonably man gave Erikson a forum.
acartia – – (11:05 AM): Yet this unreasonably man gave Erikson a forum.

No he didn't. John Oakley did. McVety was there because he is a publicity whore and will jump at any chance to get his face on TV or his voice over the radio. I am constantly surprised that anyone takes this oaf seriously. Doesn't say much for the intelligence of some people.
Blazingcatfur – – (11:42 AM): I'm more shocked that anyone could ever have taken Erickson seriously.
Blazingcatfur – – (11:43 AM): McVety isn't the issue, Erickson's twisted agenda is.
Blazingcatfur – – (11:47 AM): 1-3 % tops.
Dodoforever Canspell – – (12:36 PM): Erickson is one angry queer. Anyone making excuses for his tone and opinions must be having the exact same agenda that Erickson has .... to introduce children as young as 7 or even younger to a lifestyle fraught with disappointments, AID related diseases (as much as some would deny it, it's a fact), drug use, depression, etc.
Sex educcation, especially gender orientation and all the confusion it entails, is not for young kids. On that issue nobody can shake me.
Dodoforever Canspell – – (12:56 PM): Now that I have listened to this queer, thrown up a little and got my blood boiling .... here's what I am gonna do. That ad will be on my blog at least once a week from now until Dec 1, 2012.
Blogwrath – (2:44 PM): How is McVety's view of life "twisted"? And who represents the real "Canadian Values"? Regardless of his shortcomings, McVety is one of the few people in Canada courageous enough to oppose the Muslim invasion and the indoctrination of children, taking horrible blows in the process. Is criticism of the homosexual aggression against the Canadian values?

You are probably anti-Christian, but even from a Darwinian point of view homosexuality is an aberation - since the biological purpose of sex is procreation (no matter how many gay penguins you may bring into the argument). And I won't even go into the "homophobic" views of Marx and Engels, who are still idols of the "progressives". Gays are tolerated and have full rights in the western democracies, which are dominated by the Judeo-Christian values (that you despise).

You will not find such tolerance anywhere else in the world. Have you seen a gay pride parade in Serbia or Bulgaria? It's ten times worse than a soccer riot, with police outnumbering the participats 10 to 1. And in Russia such parades are simply banned. I don't even want to mention the situation in Africa and the Muslim countries (although the latter are supported by the mindless anti-Semitic queers).

Yet homosexuals are working very diligently to erode and destroy the values of the western democracies and gay indoctrination of school kids is one of their tools. It looks like they are succeeding - the West is almost bankrupt and it can't even defend itself, paralized by political correctness. Let me ask you then: when the West is taken over by forces that have no problem asserting their power, like the People's Republic of China or the Muslim barbarians, who will be the first to go? I don't think I need to answer that - to the new masters the concept of "special interest groups" will be as foreign as democracy.

That's what makes people like Erickson dangerous for their own cause.
Blazingcatfur – – (2:50 PM): Good for you.
Blazingcatfur – – (2:55 PM): I don't blame you.
Blazingcatfur – – (2:59 PM): Not to mention the idiots who are members of QuAIA - now that is insanity. Well said Blogwrath.
Pride – – (3:55 PM): So you decided to title the video "John Oakley with intolerant bigot Michael Erickson". Was this done as intentional irony, are you just naturally a hypocrite, or do you also willingly accept the title of "intolerant bigot" for yourself? I only ask because a tolerant, non-bigoted person would tolerate the other person's opposing viewpoint in a much less bigoted fashion.

This inquiring mind is curious to know.
Pride – – (3:59 PM): If falsification is such an issue with you, then how can you seriously suport Mcvety in anything he says. I believe he is no longer calling himself a "Doctor" since being exposed as a complete fraud. And Acartia points out some more of his deceit below. Thanks for that acartia.
Pride – – (4:00 PM): Wow, just wow. See my point above or exist as a hypocrite yourself.
Pride – – (4:56 PM): "Yet homosexuals are working very diligently to erode and destroy the values of the western democracies and gay indoctrination of school kids is one of their tools."

What interest or motivation do gay people have to "indoctrinate" school kids? You see, gay people already know that you don't "turn" people gay. They understand that they are born gay and will die gay, so it would be a pretty worthless endeavor to work diligently to such an end. No, if by "indoctrinate", you mean foster awareness and acceptance of them as the persons that they are and always will be, then yes, you might be right.
Blogwrath – (5:42 PM): So what's your point? Just because McVety wrongfully called himself "doctor" (if that's true), we have to discard his views on education?! He disagrees with homosexuality, but he hasn't called for shutting down any gay organization.

In contrast, Erickson might be an NDP big wig and a prominent member of McGuinty's indoctrination squad, but he is not going to attract many people to his cause (outside of the Xtra editors and gay parade leadership). All he wants is to shut down Sun TV, extort money from them, and humiliate their staff. I am not sure if this is considered normal behaviour in the homosexual community, but to everybody else he looks like a pathetic and vindictive bully. You may try to shut me down for offending one of your leaders (or ask Barbara Hall to throw me in jail), but people like Erickson are not going to win you any friends. However, you probably don't need friends anyway - you can get everything with bullying and threats.
batb – – (5:51 PM): Erickson's also a high school hockey coach.

http://www.michaelerickson.org/
batb – – (5:55 PM): Rates of alcohol and drug addiction are very high in the GBLTQ community, as are violence and multiple relationships. IOW, monogamy is not high on their list of priorities.

Erickson's reasoning vis a vis suicide among gays is disingenuous.

In fact Michael Erickson = disingenuous
jzaik – – (6:10 PM): That's a good point. No one's willing to talk about it because of PC. If you truly are born gay, ie. with no attraction for the opposite sex, then I would assume that it would grate away at you. Knowing that you are an anomaly to the natural reality of sexual dimorphism, must be mentally taxing. Accepting that reality must be tough.
batb – – (6:28 PM): Whether or not anyone takes "this oaf" seriously, I know enough about the statistics (which you admit you don't, acartia) on actual percentages of the population which are homosexual, which groups are more likely to contract HIV/AIDs, and which groups severely limit their lifespan by sexual activity they choose to engage in -- and it's this group, questionably, which seems to want to convince our children that they may not be the sex they thought they were or were born as.

Given that we're talking 1-3% of the population, one has to seriously question why this activist lobby has been given so much control of the TDSB sex ed curriculum. The agenda propagated by this lobby group appears to be severely partisan and is using false statistics to bolster their agenda.

The McVety ad is calling the public's attention to what's being advocated in the TDSB sex ed curriculum. If Michael Erickson stands behind the document of which he is the LEAD writer, he should have no problem with this ad. It will either stand on its own or not. Or, more to the point, now that the public has been alerted to what's in the TDSB sex ed curriculum, either it will stand on its own or not.

I get the feeling, observing Erickson's bully tactics, that he's a little worried about how well his opus will hold up to scrutiny in the light of day. It appears that the people at the TDSB were willing to take his word for the stats he cites. I suggest unwisely.
Bob Almighty – – (10:19 PM): the only thing we do not tolerate is intolerance.
Blazingcatfur – – (10:54 PM): Erickson fears the sunlight BatB, very well said.
Blazingcatfur – – (11:05 PM): Very good point Batb, there was no rush to the altar when the sham of gay marriage was rubber stamped.
Blazingcatfur – – (11:05 PM): Wonderful news keep an eye on that.
Revnant Dream – – (2:57 AM): What interest or motivation do gay people have to "indoctrinate" school kids?

I call BS on you. Its self evident why. Just go talk to someone from Penn State. By the way all these studies that say being born gay, are by gays. If their is a gay gene that means gays will be eliminated through abortion.
Why not fight that if your so certain?Look what has happened to females in China or other Countries where Women are seen as chattel. Frankly most folks don't give a hoot what you do to yourselves or what you do in bed. Agree that in work & housing ext, should have the same rights as everyone. That was won years ago. But going after children who don't even know what death is yet, is a new low by any standard. Using school, by eliminating parents input, teachings strewn with lies, even deeper in the slim pit.
Its not about respect, its grooming, & you know it.
Blogwrath – (7:39 PM): Right on, Revnant. Grooming is important. If you remember, there a recent case in California involving "family" of two lesbians and their adopted boy. The boy thought he was a girl (no wonder, having parents like them), so his "mothers" decided to prevent him from entering puberty with medications and castrate him, turning him into a girl. If a kid in a normal family was subjected to such a monstrous abuse, his parents would've been in jail long time ago. Yet homosexuals can do whatever they want with their adopted kids. I didn't hear a single gay condemning those lesbians. Obviously, indoctrination comes very handy in cases like this one.

John Oakley Show: Charles McVety vs. The Bitchy Whiner Who Wants To Censor SunTV

Post a Comment

Feed the kitty

Fan mail...

E-mail news tips to

newz

Section 13 Thought Criminals