James Moore caught with his pants down in CBC Porn storm
Moore is proving an embarrassment and needs to be booted, yesterday without even having viewed the porn flick he was accusing Kris Sims of just hunting for dirt on the CBC. Today he had to suck it up and admit the CBC is buying Porn with your tax dollars.
Minister Moore should order the head of the CBC to order the head of Radio Canada to fire the miscreants involved. The head of the CBC should then be directed by Moore to fire the head of radio Canada. Moore should then fire the head of the CBC and then offer his own resignation to the PM. He should then resign from the Conservative party and cross the floor to sit with his own kind. He would be a strong contender for the Liberal leadership.
I don't mind that this guy was watching porn--that's okay.
But BUYING it? Are you an idiot man?
Have you been on the internet dude?
geesh.
It was reported that this program in now being aired when children will not be able to view it.....yeah right.
However, it still is being aired thanks to taxpayer $$$$$
Does the CBC mandate include porn? I know it programs for special interests and demographic groups, but I don't know which Charter and Constitutionally protected group CBC is trying to satisfy.
CBC will be hard press to come up with a good response for this one.
They've stayed mum so far, I'm sure they will try to brazen it out.
I hate the CBC as much as the next guy, but at least in this case they were doing something right. They were buying soft core porn, and it actually was soft core porn.
Contrast that with the comedies that aren't even mildly funny, the dramas that are undramatic, stupid and boring, and the news which is mostly leftist propaganda.
At least with the porn, for once, the taxpayers were getting value for their CBC dollars.
Seriously stupid.
He is a John Tory Liberal through and through.
What the hell....
Have I been banned here.
http://blazingcatfur.disqus.com/admin/moderate/#comment-428169578
I'm thinking another DISSUQS epic fail.
Good job Dissuqs, you've followed me over to this blog.
Keep up the good work.
You are not banned. What happened?
Well that is a change;)
all the above .. hes a sympathizer and a traitor.
I don't know. I clicked on the link from my topic reply email notification and it takes me there.
BTW, I rarely, if ever, get an email notification from something that you write.
*giggle* the CBC are populated with real people -- awesome!
(in other news: the Americanization of Canada continues, soon, every Canadian bear will be allowed to have arms)
Kris Smith can show me porn anytime she wants, and unlike James Moore, I'd have the onions to offer a valid answer on camera to her questions.
FYI in the early 1970s the Radio Canada TV used to have Sunday night avante garde artsy foreign films (read as soft core.) Thanks to the subtitles I vastly improved on my French comprehension.
And when their eloquence escapes me
Their logic ties me up and rapes me
De do do do, de da da da
Is all I want to say to you
De do do do, de da da da
When Moore is finally out of politics, he can be the ombudsman for his beloved CBC. He's already their pet poodle.
Moore has made it clear he likes the state run broadcaster and dislikes private networks. It is obvious that he is biased and therefore he should be removed from his position.
Moore's fired! Soon, anyway, I hope.
Oh, and Ezra is on the case like a shark on chum.
do you really want him to sleep on your couch?
I was having the same trouble. I have no idea who/what DISSUQS is but I got a couple of messages about having to try again. And, my first comment on the other thread about this, with the link to suntv's coverage of James Moore's about-face on porn at the CBC, never posted.
I have a beautiful basement cell.
Yup - that's porn. Did the CBC ask me if I wanted to support this display with my tax dollars - nope.
What is now considered soft porn today, was considered hard porn twenty years ago.
The CBC logo along with BJ's is fitting when you realize that is what they are doing to Canadian taxpayers.
Criminal psychologists are well aware of the phenomenon wherein actions of criminals are deemed normal by them. In other words, because the criminals participate, they think everyone else does.
Not everyone, despite your subtle assertion,do nott view porn online, soft or not.
It may surprise you to learn that a significant portion of the population does not view such material.
As an act of decency towards other persons in the home you reside in that may use the same computer as you, please clean the keyboard after use with alcohol wipes.
It's been a bit buggy, it will right itself.
It's been silly of late.
It gets even worse.
Wit'll you see the next clip.
Instead of being embarrassed by this, he lashes out at the network that asks why taxpayers are funding smut.
Classy, Moore.
Did you actually SEE the clips?
I bet someone took him to the woodshed and they will again after his comments to Kris Sims. check out the Ezra Kris Sims clip a couple of posts up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JL8xhrv9Ck
That's the problem with blasphemy laws (which I consider pornography laws are of a kind) -- what exactly is pornography?
Who gets to decide for other people what is and isn't pornographic?
Nature is quite pornographic all the time -- just look at those flowers, sexual organs spraying their seed everywhere.
Who gets to decide what their children watch/listen to on tv? What aboot the parents who use the tv as a baby sitter vs. those who actively participate with their children with tv?
>>